prisma vs typeorm
Side-by-side comparison of prisma and typeorm
Download Trends
Verdict
Prisma is positioned as a comprehensive database toolkit suitable for developers who need a robust ORM with a modern interface for managing data in their applications. Its extensive support for various databases and the inclusion of a GUI make it a strong option for both new and existing projects.
In contrast, TypeORM serves a broader audience by catering specifically to those working with TypeScript and a wide range of databases, including support for both SQL and NoSQL options. It's particularly beneficial for developers focused on using the latest ECMAScript standards, making it a good choice for modern TypeScript projects where flexibility is essential.
Consider using Prisma for larger projects or teams who prefer a feature-rich environment, while TypeORM might be more appealing for smaller projects or where simpler configurations are required. Additionally, Prisma's larger size and ongoing open issues may factor into decisions surrounding team experience and project complexity.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | prisma | typeorm |
|---|---|---|
| License | Prisma is licensed under Apache-2.0, promoting a permissive usage model. | TypeORM's MIT license is also permissive and widely accepted. |
| Version | ✓Latest version is 7.3.0, indicating more recent updates. | Version 0.3.28 suggests it may not be as actively maintained. |
| Open Issues | 2.5K open issues may indicate challenges or areas needing improvement for Prisma. | ✓479 open issues suggest better issue management for TypeORM. |
| GitHub Forks | 2.0K forks suggest active development and experimentation with Prisma. | ✓6.5K forks for TypeORM indicate higher developer engagement in variations. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓With 45.2K stars, Prisma has a strong community backing. | 36.3K stars for TypeORM reflect a solid community but less visibility. |
| Unpacked Size | At 37.8 MB, Prisma is larger and may require more resources. | ✓TypeORM is lighter at 20.8 MB, potentially better for smaller applications. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Prisma's GUI can simplify onboarding for new users. | TypeORM may have a higher learning curve due to its configuration subtleties. |
| Team Experience | Ideal for teams familiar with TypeScript or seeking an intuitive UI. | TypeORM is better suited for teams experienced with data-mapper patterns. |
| Database Support | Prisma supports multiple popular databases, offering flexibility. | TypeORM also provides extensive support for various SQL and NoSQL databases. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓8.0M weekly downloads indicate widespread usage and adoption. | 3.3M weekly downloads show decent but lower popularity. |
| Use Case Flexibility | Prisma excels in environments needing a strongly typed ORM and migrations. | ✓TypeORM is suitable for both SQL and NoSQL applications, offering more versatility. |
| Migration and Trade-offs | Prisma's migration system is user-friendly but can lead to versioning issues. | ✓TypeORM provides a more traditional approach but may involve more manual management. |