prosemirror-state vs quill
Side-by-side comparison of prosemirror-state and quill
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.5M
- Stars
- 230
- Gzip Size
- 19.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3mo ago
- Open Issues
- 0
- Forks
- 75
- Unpacked Size
- 184.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.9M
- Stars
- 46.8K
- Gzip Size
- 60.4 kB
- License
- BSD-3-Clause
- Last Updated
- 6mo ago
- Open Issues
- 625
- Forks
- 3.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 3.0 MB
- Dependencies
- 6
Download Trends
Verdict
prosemirror-state is tailored for developers looking to build customizable text editors with granular control over editor state management. Its lightweight nature and direct manipulation capabilities make it ideal for projects requiring extensive flexibility and control over the editing experience.
In contrast, quill serves as a powerful out-of-the-box rich text editor that caters more to users seeking a robust solution without extensive custom development. Its larger community and fostered ecosystem of plugins can make it a more suitable choice for teams looking for quicker implementation, especially in larger or less developer-focused projects.
However, developers considering quill should note its heavier footprint and potential for dealing with unresolved issues, highlighted by its relatively high number of open issues. On the other hand, prosemirror-state, with no open issues reported, suggests a stable platform for teams prioritizing reliability in their editor's core functionality.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | prosemirror-state | quill |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT License, allowing for commercial use. | BSD-3-Clause License, permissive and business-friendly. |
| Version | Latest version is 1.4.4. | ✓Latest version is 2.0.3. |
| Description | Focuses on editor state management for custom solutions. | A complete rich text editor with extensive features. |
| Open Issues | ✓No open issues, signaling strong stability. | 625 open issues may impact maintenance perception. |
| GitHub Forks | 75 forks suggest limited community contributions. | ✓3.6K forks indicate a more vibrant ecosystem for collaboration. |
| GitHub Stars | 230 stars reflect a smaller niche community. | ✓46.8K stars indicate a large and active user base. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Lightweight at 184.0 kB, suitable for performance-critical apps. | Larger at 3.0 MB, which could affect loading times. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Higher weekly downloads at 5.5M, indicating greater usage. | Lower at 2.9M, showing less community traction. |
| Community Support | Smaller community may limit resources and support. | ✓Larger community provides extensive resources and plugins. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓More efficient at 19.6 kB, helpful for smaller projects. | Less efficient at 60.4 kB, which may slow down load times. |
| Use Case Flexibility | ✓Highly flexible for custom implementations. | More feature-rich out-of-the-box for general usage. |