@tiptap/core vs quill
Side-by-side comparison of @tiptap/core and quill
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.3M
- Stars
- 35.0K
- Gzip Size
- 91.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 866
- Forks
- 2.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 11
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.9M
- Stars
- 46.8K
- Gzip Size
- 60.4 kB
- License
- BSD-3-Clause
- Last Updated
- 6mo ago
- Open Issues
- 625
- Forks
- 3.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 3.0 MB
- Dependencies
- 6
Download Trends
Verdict
@tiptap/core serves developers looking for a headless rich text editor that integrates smoothly into modern frameworks like React and Vue. It provides flexibility in building custom editing experiences without enforcing a specific UI. In contrast, quill is designed for those seeking a more traditional, fully-featured rich text editor out of the box, catering to a wide range of use cases with a focus on usability and rich features.
When choosing between @tiptap/core and quill, consider your project requirements and team experience. If your project needs a customizable solution and your team is comfortable with building UI components, @tiptap/core may be the better choice. On the other hand, if you require a quick-to-implement, rich text editor with established features and your team prefers a straightforward setup, quill could be advantageous.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @tiptap/core | quill |
|---|---|---|
| Topics | ✓Covers a broader set of related topics and frameworks. | Focused primarily on the quill ecosystem. |
| License | Uses MIT License, permissive and widely accepted. | BSD-3-Clause License, also permissive but slightly different terms. |
| Version | ✓Latest version is 3.19.0, indicating ongoing development. | Version 2.0.3 shows a stable release, but less recent. |
| Categories | Specializes in rich text editing with room for customization. | Also positioned as a rich text editor, suitable for standard use. |
| Description | Headless rich text editor offering flexibility. | Fully-featured editor with a focus on ease of use. |
| Open Issues | 865 open issues may indicate ongoing challenges or active development. | ✓625 open issues suggest relatively fewer concerns to address. |
| GitHub Forks | 2.9K forks open avenues for community-driven enhancements. | ✓3.6K forks provide more adaptation options by developers. |
| GitHub Stars | 35.0K stars reflect strong community approval. | ✓46.8K stars suggest wider community engagement. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓At 2.3 MB, it is slightly smaller than quill. | 3.0 MB indicates a bit more overhead. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓5.2 million downloads indicates high adoption and community support. | 2.9 million downloads show significant but lesser use. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 91.0 kB, larger due to richer functionality. | ✓60.4 kB indicates a leaner initial footprint. |