COMPARISON · RICH TEXT EDITOR

@tiptap/core vs. quill

Side-by-side comparison · 9 metrics · 14 criteria

@tiptap/core v3.26.0 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
5.8M
Stars
37.1K
Gzip Size
29.7 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
3mo ago
Open Issues
884
Forks
3.0K
Unpacked Size
2.4 MB
Dependencies
0
quill v2.0.3 · BSD-3-Clause
Weekly Downloads
1.8M
Stars
47.1K
Gzip Size
60.4 kB
License
BSD-3-Clause
Last Updated
1y ago
Open Issues
650
Forks
3.6K
Unpacked Size
3.0 MB
Dependencies
6
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

@tiptap/core vs quill downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for @tiptap/core and quill2 download series from Jun 2025 to May 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.011.5M23.0M34.5M46.0MJun 2025SepDecMarMay 2026
@tiptap/core
quill
FEATURE COMPARISON

Criteria — @tiptap/core vs quill

Learning Curve
@tiptap/core
Potentially steeper, requires understanding ProseMirror concepts
quill
Generally smoother for common use cases
Core Philosophy
@tiptap/core
Headless, framework-agnostic, composable by design
quill
Opinionated, feature-rich out-of-the-box with customizable UI
Performance Focus
@tiptap/core
Prioritizes minimal footprint and high performance
quill
Balanced performance with feature richness
TypeScript Support
@tiptap/core
Excellent, strong typing for API and extensions
quill
Good, but may be less comprehensive than @tiptap/core's derived types
Extensibility Model
@tiptap/core
Modular extensions integrating with ProseMirror's core
quill
Extensions interacting with Quill's specific API and rendering
Bundle Size Efficiency
@tiptap/core
Significantly smaller gzip bundle size
quill
Larger gzip bundle size, roughly double
ProseMirror Dependency
@tiptap/core
Directly leverages ProseMirror, relies on its ecosystem
quill
Independent, does not rely on ProseMirror
UI Customization Focus
@tiptap/core
Maximum control, UI developed by the implementer
quill
Provided UI components, highly configurable
Underlying Architecture
@tiptap/core
Built on top of ProseMirror, leveraging its document model
quill
Self-contained document model and rendering engine
Integration with Frameworks
@tiptap/core
Official extensions for React, Vue, Angular, leveraging framework patterns
quill
Plugin system adaptable, potentially less direct framework pattern integration
Document Complexity Handling
@tiptap/core
Exceptional for complex schemas, custom nodes/marks via ProseMirror
quill
Robust for standard rich text, less inherently suited for highly complex custom structures
First-Party Ecosystem Support
@tiptap/core
Core package with official framework wrappers
quill
More self-contained offering with richer built-in features
Developer Experience - Tooling
@tiptap/core
Benefits from ProseMirror tooling and community extensions
quill
Mature tooling and extensive documentation for its own system
Developer Experience - API Design
@tiptap/core
Composable API focused on extending ProseMirror core
quill
Comprehensive API for document manipulation and UI control
VERDICT

@tiptap/core is a headless, framework-agnostic rich text editor built on top of ProseMirror. Its core strength lies in its composability and flexibility, making it ideal for developers who need to build highly custom editing experiences. The headless nature means it doesn't dictate the UI, allowing developers to integrate it seamlessly into existing designs and component systems. This approach appeals to teams prioritizing control and a minimal JS footprint for their editor.

Quill, on the other hand, is a rich text editor that provides a more opinionated, out-of-the-box solution with a fully customizable UI. It's designed for developers who want a robust, feature-rich editor that can be implemented relatively quickly without extensive UI development. Quill's focus is on delivering a polished user experience with a powerful API for handling rich text documents.

Technically, a significant difference is their architectural foundation. @tiptap/core leverages ProseMirror, a sophisticated toolkit for building rich text editors, which provides a powerful document model and command system. This means @tiptap/core inherits ProseMirror's underlying capabilities for complex content structures and custom node/mark definitions. Quill employs its own internal document model and rendering engine, offering a more self-contained system that doesn't rely on an external editor framework like ProseMirror.

Another key difference is their extensibility model. @tiptap/core embraces a modular design where functionality is added through extensions. These extensions can modify the behavior or add new features to the editor, aligning with its headless philosophy. Quill also supports extensions, but its approach integrates more directly with its own rendering and document model. This means Quill's extensions often interact with its specific API for modifying content and UI elements.

Developer experience with @tiptap/core can involve a steeper initial learning curve, especially if developers are not familiar with ProseMirror's concepts. However, its strong TypeScript support and clear API for defining custom elements can lead to maintainable and predictable codebases for complex scenarios. Quill generally offers a smoother onboarding experience for common rich text editing tasks, and its well-documented API makes it easier to get started quickly for standard use cases.

Bundle size is a notable differentiator. @tiptap/core consistently offers a significantly smaller JavaScript payload, measured at 29.7 kB (gzipped). This makes it an attractive option for performance-critical applications or sites where minimizing initial load times is paramount. Quill's bundle size is roughly double that of @tiptap/core at 60.4 kB (gzipped), which might be a consideration for less performance-sensitive applications or when the editor is not a primary focus.

For projects requiring a completely custom UI and deep integration into a unique design system, @tiptap/core is the superior choice. Its headless nature and composability allow maximum flexibility. If you need a highly polished, feature-rich editor that can be set up with minimal UI coding and offers a familiar WYSIWYG experience out-of-the-box, Quill is likely the more pragmatic option.

@tiptap/core's integration with modern frontend frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular (via official extensions) makes it a versatile choice for component-based development. It benefits from the rich ecosystem of ProseMirror plugins and community contributions. Quill has a long-standing history and a mature ecosystem, but its integrations might feel more tied to its own architecture rather than leveraging external framework patterns as directly as @tiptap/core's extensions.

When considering niche use cases, @tiptap/core's ProseMirror foundation makes it exceptionally powerful for implementing complex document structures like those found in scientific journals or legal documents, where custom nodes and marks are essential. Quill excels in standard document editing scenarios like blog posts or content management systems where a rich feature set and ease of use are the primary drivers.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

RELATED COMPARISONS 6
@tiptap/core vs slate ★ 68.8K · 7.0M/wk @tiptap/core vs lexical ★ 60.6K · 7.4M/wk @tiptap/core vs prosemirror-state ★ 37.4K · 11.8M/wk quill vs slate ★ 78.8K · 2.9M/wk lexical vs quill ★ 70.6K · 3.4M/wk prosemirror-state vs quill ★ 47.4K · 7.8M/wk