@tiptap/core vs quill
Side-by-side comparison of @tiptap/core and quill
- Weekly Downloads
- 6.7M
- Stars
- 36.1K
- Gzip Size
- 92.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 886
- Forks
- 2.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 11
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.5M
- Stars
- 47.0K
- Gzip Size
- 60.4 kB
- License
- BSD-3-Clause
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 634
- Forks
- 3.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 3.0 MB
- Dependencies
- 6
@tiptap/core vs quill Download Trends
@tiptap/core vs quill: Verdict
Tiptap Core is a headless, framework-agnostic rich text editor toolkit designed for developers who want maximum control over the UI and behavior. Its core philosophy revolves around providing a minimal, extensible Prosemirror wrapper that integrates seamlessly into various frontend frameworks like React, Vue, and Svelte, making it ideal for custom-tailored editing experiences. Developers who prioritize a highly customizable and modern architecture, where the editor itself is a component to be built around, will find Tiptap Core compelling.
Quill, on the other hand, presents itself as a powerful, out-of-the-box rich text editor focusing on providing a robust and user-friendly WYSIWYG experience with a rich feature set ready for immediate integration. Its design emphasizes ease of use and a comprehensive set of built-in functionalities, appealing to projects that require a fully functional editor with minimal setup time and a familiar user interface. Quill is well-suited for applications seeking a reliable and feature-complete editor solution without extensive customization of the core editing mechanics.
A key architectural difference lies in their approach to extensibility and rendering. Tiptap Core, leveraging Prosemirror, is inherently more modular and focuses on a data-first, state-driven editing model. It doesn't dictate UI components, allowing developers to build their own toolbars, menus, and popups using their preferred framework. Quill, while extensible through its own API, typically ships with a more opinionated structure and a default set of UI elements, managing both the editor state and rendering in a more integrated fashion.
Regarding their extension models, Tiptap Core treats extensions as fundamental building blocks that deeply integrate with the Prosemirror core, defining document structure, schema, and behavior. This allows for highly complex and custom document models. Quill uses a plugin-based system where extensions (often called modules or themes) enhance the editor's functionality, such as adding specific formatting options or integrating with external services. While both can be extended, Tiptap Core's approach is arguably more about composing the editor's very essence, whereas Quill's focuses on adding layers of functionality on top of a defined core.
From a developer experience perspective, Tiptap Core offers a steeper learning curve due to its reliance on Prosemirror concepts, particularly for those new to state-based editors. However, for experienced developers comfortable with modern JavaScript architectures and functional programming paradigms, its headless nature and framework integrations provide immense flexibility and can lead to a very clean, maintainable codebase. Quill generally offers a more immediate developer experience, with a clearer API for common tasks and a well-documented set of features, making it quicker to get a basic editor up and running.
When considering performance and bundle size, Quill has a notable advantage. Its gzip bundle size is significantly smaller than Tiptap Core's, making it a more attractive option for applications where minimizing JavaScript payload is critical. Tiptap Core, while still reasonably sized, includes more overhead due to its reliance on Prosemirror and its more flexible, framework-agnostic architecture, which requires a robust core to manage.
For developers needing a highly customized or framework-integrated editor where the UI is a primary development concern, Tiptap Core is the recommended choice. It excels when you need to build a unique editing experience that bends to your application's specific design and workflow, such as within a complex CMS or a specialized document editor. If your priority is a quick-to-implement, feature-rich, and robust rich text editor with a standard interface, Quill is the more practical selection, suitable for blogs, forums, or content management systems that require a polished, ready-to-use editor.
Ecosystem and long-term maintenance considerations point to different strengths. Tiptap Core benefits from the active development of its larger ecosystem of related packages (tiptap/vue, tiptap/react, etc.) and the long-standing maturity of Prosemirror. This suggests a vibrant and well-supported future, especially for those already invested in the Tiptap vision for headless UI components. Quill, as a standalone, mature project, has a proven track record of stability and reliability. Its established codebase and dedicated community ensure ongoing support, though its extension model might be less expansive than Tiptap's component-driven approach.
In niche use cases, Tiptap Core's headless nature makes it exceptionally suitable for integrating rich text editing capabilities into mobile applications using frameworks like React Native or even into non-browser environments where a full DOM is not present, provided a suitable renderer can be implemented. Its Prosemirror foundation is powerful enough to handle intricate document structures and collaborative editing scenarios. Quill, while primarily a web-based editor, can be adapted, but its core design is more geared towards traditional web applications, focusing on delivering a premium desktop-like editing experience within the browser.
@tiptap/core vs quill: Feature Comparison
| Criteria | @tiptap/core | quill |
|---|---|---|
| UI Control | ✓ Does not dictate UI, empowering developers to build custom interfaces (toolbars, menus). | Ships with default UI elements and a more integrated rendering mechanism. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper, especially for those unfamiliar with Prosemirror or state-driven editors. | ✓ Generally more immediate and straightforward for common editing tasks. |
| Core Philosophy | Headless, framework-agnostic toolkit focused on maximal developer control. | Powerful, out-of-the-box editor prioritizing user-friendliness and feature richness. |
| Primary Audience | Developers seeking highly custom, modern, and integrated editing experiences. | Projects needing a functional, feature-complete editor with minimal integration effort. |
| Developer Tooling | Benefits from the Tiptap ecosystem and Prosemirror community tooling. | Mature, well-documented API with dedicated support resources. |
| Targeted Use Cases | Complex CMS, bespoke document editors, applications requiring unique UI/UX. | Blogs, forums, content management systems needing a ready and polished editor. |
| Customization Depth | ✓ Enables deep customization of document structure, schema, and presentation. | Extensible, but focused on enhancing existing functionalities rather than core structural changes. |
| Extensibility Model | Modular extensions compose the editor's core schema and behavior deeply. | Plugin-based system for adding layers of functionality on top of the core. |
| Headless Capability | ✓ Core strength, enabling integration into non-standard environments or headless CMS. | Less emphasis on headless, primarily designed for browser-based rich text interfaces. |
| Framework Integration | ✓ Designed for seamless integration with React, Vue, Svelte, and others via specific packages. | Primarily a standalone JavaScript library, though adaptable to frameworks. |
| Bundle Size Efficiency | Larger due to robust core and architectural flexibility, requiring more overhead. | ✓ Significantly smaller, making it ideal for performance-critical applications. |
| Prosemirror Dependency | ✓ Directly leverages and extends Prosemirror, requiring understanding of its paradigms. | Independent of Prosemirror, using its own internal editor engine. |
| Architecture Foundation | ✓ Built on Prosemirror and concepts, offering a data-first, state-driven approach. | Opinionated structure with integrated state management and rendering logic. |
| Out-of-the-Box Features | Requires assembly of features through extensions and custom UI development. | ✓ Comes with a comprehensive set of built-in formatting and editing features. |