superagent vs undici
Side-by-side comparison of superagent and undici
- Weekly Downloads
- 15.0M
- Stars
- 16.7K
- Gzip Size
- 94.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 180
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 544.5 kB
- Dependencies
- 39
- Weekly Downloads
- 44.8M
- Stars
- 7.4K
- Gzip Size
- 165.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11h ago
- Open Issues
- 326
- Forks
- 701
- Unpacked Size
- 1.5 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
superagent excels in providing an elegant and feature-rich HTTP client experience with a fluent API, making it particularly suitable for developers looking for ease of use in both browser and Node.js environments. On the other hand, undici is designed as a low-level, performance-focused HTTP/1.1 client specifically for Node.js, appealing to those who need fine control and optimization of HTTP requests.
For smaller projects or teams less experienced in managing low-level HTTP details, superagent may be the better choice due to its user-friendly API. Conversely, if your application requires maximum performance, especially in a Node.js backend, undici would be the recommended option due to its lower-level architecture. Consider your team's familiarity with HTTP intricacies when making a choice.
It's also worth noting that while superagent has a smaller bundle size, making it easier to integrate into lightweight projects, undici’s larger size indicates a more comprehensive feature set. Migrating from superagent to undici may involve additional complexity due to the difference in their APIs and operational paradigms.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | superagent | undici |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓180 open issues may indicate moderate active maintenance challenges. | 328 open issues could suggest more active development complexity. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓16.7K stars suggest high community appreciation and usage. | 7.4K stars reflect a niche but dedicated user base. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2026-01-06 indicating recent activity. | ✓Last update on 2026-02-07 shows ongoing developments. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓With an unpacked size of 544.5 kB, it is lighter and more suitable for basic use cases. | At 1.5 MB, it is bulkier, but includes a richer set of features. |
| Team Experience | ✓Suitable for developers of all experience levels with an intuitive API. | More suited for teams with advanced knowledge of HTTP and Node.js. |
| Weekly Downloads | 14.9M weekly downloads indicate solid usage and community trust. | ✓With 43.8M downloads, it shows a strong foothold in Node.js applications. |
| Description Focus | Provides an elegant, fluent API for both browser and Node environments. | ✓A low-level HTTP client tailored specifically for Node.js. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓At 94.0 kB, it offers a compact package size for applications. | The size of 165.6 kB may discourage use in smaller projects. |