@builder.io/qwik vs astro
Side-by-side comparison of @builder.io/qwik and astro
- Weekly Downloads
- 23.5K
- Stars
- 21.9K
- Gzip Size
- 32.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 35m ago
- Open Issues
- 110
- Forks
- 1.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 23.4 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.2M
- Stars
- 56.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 7h ago
- Open Issues
- 233
- Forks
- 3.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.5 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
@builder.io/qwik is geared towards developers focusing on server-side rendering and optimizing content delivery with features like lazy-loading and animations. It serves teams building performance-driven applications with specific emphasis on rendering efficiency.
On the other hand, astro is designed as a modern site builder emphasizing development experience and performance, suitable for a wide range of projects from blogs to more complex applications. It particularly excels for teams prioritizing fast builds and static site generation.
Consider @builder.io/qwik if your project demands highly optimized server-first rendering, particularly in larger applications. Choose astro for its broad use cases and developer-centric features, but be mindful that its larger community support may help mitigate issues during development.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @builder.io/qwik | astro |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT licensed, allowing flexible use. | Also MIT licensed, ensuring similar flexibility. |
| Focus Area | ✓Specializes in server-side rendering and lazy-loading. | Centers on site building with a modern approach. |
| Open Issues | ✓111 open issues showing some maintenance needs. | 226 open issues suggesting a need for ongoing support. |
| GitHub Forks | 1.4K forks allowing for community adaptations. | ✓3.1K forks providing considerable community engagement. |
| GitHub Stars | 21.9K stars showcasing solid interest. | ✓56.6K stars indicating a more popular choice. |
| Target Users | ✓Ideal for teams needing optimized SSR capabilities. | Great for developers looking for comprehensive tools for static and dynamic sites. |
| Unpacked Size | 23.4 MB which is relatively large for a framework. | ✓2.5 MB indicating a lightweight solution. |
| Latest Version | Version 1.19.0 with stable features. | ✓Version 5.17.1 with continuous improvements. |
| Weekly Downloads | 23.8K downloads reflect moderate usage. | ✓1.2M downloads indicate widespread adoption. |
| Community Support | Moderate community with 21.9K stars. | ✓Strong community support evidenced by 56.6K stars. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 32.8 kB, moderate size for initial load. | Not specified but typically aims for minimal impact. |