@builder.io/qwik vs svelte
Side-by-side comparison of @builder.io/qwik and svelte
- Weekly Downloads
- 23.5K
- Stars
- 21.9K
- Gzip Size
- 32.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 35m ago
- Open Issues
- 110
- Forks
- 1.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 23.4 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.7M
- Stars
- 85.7K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 18h ago
- Open Issues
- 974
- Forks
- 4.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.8 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
@builder.io/qwik is a suitable choice for developers focused on server-side-rendering and projects that require lazy-loading and rich styling/animation capabilities. Its framework provides a specialized approach tailored for more complex web applications. In contrast, svelte excels in building all types of web apps with a strong emphasis on performance and simplicity, appealing to developers who favor a more streamlined development experience.
For teams with experience in traditional frameworks and looking to implement advanced features, @builder.io/qwik may be favorable, particularly in large-scale projects where server-side rendering is critical. Svelte is ideal for projects seeking high interactivity with less overhead, appealing to smaller teams or those new to web development due to its easier learning curve. In scenarios involving rapid development and deployment, svelte’s lightweight nature stands out.
While migrating to @builder.io/qwik could pose challenges due to its specific server-side capabilities, fewer package dependencies in svelte can lead to quicker onboarding and immediate productivity. Therefore, the decision may strongly hinge on the project’s specific requirements and the team's current architectural preferences.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @builder.io/qwik | svelte |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license ensures open-source accessibility. | Also licensed under MIT, providing similar freedoms. |
| Version | Current version 1.19.0. | ✓Latest version is 5.50.0, indicating more frequent updates. |
| Description | Focused on server-side rendering and lazy-loading with rich styling. | Emphasizes performance and simplicity for cybernetically enhanced web apps. |
| Open Issues | 111 open issues might indicate ongoing challenges. | ✓968 open issues signify significant usage and potential concerns. |
| Performance | Optimized for specific server-side scenarios. | Engineered for fast rendering but with a focus on client-side. |
| GitHub Forks | 1.4K forks demonstrate some project interest. | ✓4.8K forks illustrate higher engagement and adaptation. |
| GitHub Stars | 21.9K stars show a moderate level of adoption. | ✓85.7K stars suggest a strong community following. |
| Unpacked Size | Unpacked size of 23.4 MB suggests a heavier framework. | ✓Unpacked size of 2.8 MB is considerably lighter. |
| Ideal Use Case | Best for complex web applications needing SSR. | ✓Ideal for projects that prioritize reactive UI with rapid development. |
| Learning Curve | May require more time to understand server-side features. | ✓Typically has a gentler learning curve, easier for beginners. |
| Weekly Downloads | 23.8K weekly downloads indicating niche usage. | ✓2.7M weekly downloads, reflecting a large active user base. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Bundle size is 32.8 kB, relatively efficient for a meta-framework. | Not provided, but generally indicates svelte's minimal approach. |