@builder.io/qwik vs next
Side-by-side comparison of @builder.io/qwik and next
- Weekly Downloads
- 23.5K
- Stars
- 21.9K
- Gzip Size
- 32.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 35m ago
- Open Issues
- 110
- Forks
- 1.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 23.4 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 35.8M
- Stars
- 137.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 27m ago
- Open Issues
- 3.3K
- Forks
- 30.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 141.6 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
@builder.io/qwik is designed for developers looking to implement a sub-framework with an emphasis on server-side rendering and optimizations like lazy loading and animations. It serves well for projects where performance and deliverability are critical, especially in JavaScript-based environments.
In contrast, next provides a mature and robust framework for React-based applications. It is better suited for larger applications where static site generation and server-side rendering are vital, benefiting from a larger community and more extensive resources and documentation.
While @builder.io/qwik is notably lightweight and focuses on modern web capabilities, its smaller weekly download count and limited support might be drawbacks for teams requiring comprehensive support. Conversely, next’s larger footprint and substantial community support may offer more reliability in production environments but at the cost of unpacked size.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @builder.io/qwik | next |
|---|---|---|
| Popularity | Moderate popularity with 23.8K weekly downloads. | ✓High popularity at 35.3M weekly downloads. |
| Bundle Size | ✓Small bundle size at 32.8 kB, ideal for performance-sensitive applications. | Bundle size is not specified but likely larger due to framework dependencies. |
| Open Issues | ✓111 open issues suggesting manageable maintenance. | 3.3K open issues indicating a potentially larger scope of challenges. |
| GitHub Stars | 21.9K stars indicating a fair level of community interest. | ✓137.6K stars showing significant developer engagement. |
| Last Updated | Both packages were last updated on the same date, reflecting similar maintenance schedules. | Both packages were last updated on the same date, reflecting similar maintenance schedules. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Lightweight at 23.4 MB, potentially beneficial for speed. | Heavier at 141.6 MB, which may affect load times. |
| Framework Type | Meta framework focusing on server-rendering and optimizations. | Well-established meta framework primarily for React applications. |
| Community Support | Emerging community with a good number of forks and stars. | ✓Established community with strong support and numerous resources. |
| Use Case Suitability | Well-suited for projects focused on optimization and lazy loading. | ✓Best for complex React applications needing extensive routing and SSR. |
| Team Experience Requirement | This may require developers familiar with modern web concepts. | ✓Ideal for teams already experienced in React development. |