next vs solid-js
Side-by-side comparison of next and solid-js
- Weekly Downloads
- 35.8M
- Stars
- 137.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 27m ago
- Open Issues
- 3.3K
- Forks
- 30.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 141.6 MB
- Dependencies
- —
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.5M
- Stars
- 35.1K
- Gzip Size
- 4.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 13d ago
- Open Issues
- 130
- Forks
- 1.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 1.1 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
Next is primarily designed for building scalable, server-rendered React applications, making it an excellent choice for projects that require robust features like static site generation and server-side rendering. It serves its audience well with extensive community support and resources due to its popularity within the React ecosystem.
In contrast, solid-js focuses on delivering a lightweight, declarative UI library aimed at high performance through fine-grained reactivity. It may be more suitable for smaller applications or projects where simplicity and speed are prioritized, especially for teams with experience in reactive programming paradigms.
When considering migration, teams looking to shift to next might face a steeper learning curve given its more comprehensive architecture. On the other hand, the straightforward approach of solid-js can ease onboarding but may lack some advanced features that larger projects could require.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | next | solid-js |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | Released under MIT, allowing broad usage and contribution. | Also MIT licensed, providing similar freedoms. |
| Open Issues | 3.3K open issues may suggest larger complexities in maintaining the framework. | ✓Only 129 open issues reflect a more manageable codebase. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓137.6K stars showing significant developer interest and trust. | 35.1K stars indicate a respectable but lesser level of acclaim. |
| Last Updated | ✓Latest update in February 2026, indicating active maintenance. | January 2026, showing a recent but less frequent update cycle. |
| Unpacked Size | Substantial at 141.6 MB, suitable for larger applications. | ✓Very minimal at 1.1 MB, making it easy to incorporate into projects. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper due to advanced features and configurations. | ✓Gentler, allowing for quicker understanding and implementation. |
| Team Experience | Best suited for teams familiar with React and the complexities of full-stack frameworks. | ✓Accessible for teams looking for simpler reactive UI without deep framework knowledge. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High popularity with 35.3M weekly downloads indicating strong community usage. | Lower usage at 1.5M weekly downloads, suggesting a smaller user base. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Not specified but expected higher due to framework nature. | ✓Very small at 4.0 kB, promoting fast load times. |
| Overall Positioning | ✓Best for scalable server-rendered applications with extensive features. | Ideal for lightweight, high-performance UI without complex infrastructure. |
| Use Case Flexibility | ✓Highly flexible for various web applications requiring server-side logic. | More narrowly focused on client-side applications needing efficient rendering. |