astro vs solid-js

Side-by-side comparison of astro and solid-js

astro v5.17.1 MIT
Weekly Downloads
1.2M
Stars
56.6K
Gzip Size
License
MIT
Last Updated
7h ago
Open Issues
233
Forks
3.1K
Unpacked Size
2.5 MB
Dependencies
solid-js v1.9.11 MIT
Weekly Downloads
1.5M
Stars
35.1K
Gzip Size
4.0 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
13d ago
Open Issues
130
Forks
1.0K
Unpacked Size
1.1 MB
Dependencies
1

Download Trends

Download trends for astro and solid-js01.4M2.8M4.3M5.7MFeb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26
astro
solid-js

Verdict

Astro excels at building modern websites with a focus on developer experience and performance, making it ideal for content-heavy projects that require a hybrid approach with static and dynamic content. Solid-js, on the other hand, is tailored for creating reactive user interfaces, catering more to application development where interactivity and data handling are paramount.

For projects with substantial content and a need for optimization, Astro is the preferred choice due to its capabilities as a static-site generator. Conversely, if developing applications that need fine-grained reactivity and control over UI components, solid-js is better suited, especially for teams experienced in JavaScript and needing quick rendering times.

Migrating between these two may require significant changes in architecture, as Astro emphasizes static generation while solid-js focuses on client-side interactivity. Developers should assess their project needs closely before choosing, considering long-term maintenance and scalability based on the framework's characteristics.

Detailed Comparison

Criteria astro solid-js
Topics Focuses on static site generation and hybrid components Emphasizes reactive UI building
License Both packages use MIT License Both packages use MIT License
Version Latest version is 5.17.1 Latest version is 1.9.11
Categories Listed under Meta Framework, versatile for various projects Also categorized similarly, targeting similar use cases
Open Issues 226 open issues might indicate a need for improvement 129 open issues suggest a more stable release
Performance High performance with optimized static site generation Excellent performance for interactive applications
GitHub Forks 3.1K forks suggest active development and experimentation 1.0K forks suggest less community contributions
GitHub Stars 56.6K stars suggesting strong popularity 35.1K stars indicating moderate popularity
Unpacked Size At 2.5 MB, it is larger compared to solid-js Compact at 1.1 MB for smaller projects
Weekly Downloads 1.2M downloads indicate solid community usage 1.5M downloads indicate slightly higher usage
Community Support Larger community indicated by stars and forks Smaller community but still supported
Bundle Size (gzip) Not specified Minimal at 4.0 kB, optimizing load times

Related Comparisons