cac vs yargs
Side-by-side comparison of cac and yargs
- Weekly Downloads
- 22.4M
- Stars
- 2.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 68
- Forks
- 110
- Unpacked Size
- 81.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 147.3M
- Stars
- 11.4K
- Gzip Size
- 34.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 304
- Forks
- 1.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 231.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 13
Download Trends
Verdict
cac is an excellent choice for developers seeking a lightweight and formidable framework for building command-line applications. Its simplicity and minimal footprint make it ideal for smaller projects or when a quick setup is essential, appealing to developers who prioritize ease of use and efficiency.
In contrast, yargs excels in scenarios requiring more extensive functionality and customization. With significantly higher weekly downloads and community engagement, yargs is suited for larger and more complex applications, particularly where advanced options and detailed command parsing are necessary.
While migrating from one to the other may involve reworking certain logic, cac's less complex structure might ease the transition for simpler use cases, whereas yargs might require a deeper understanding due to its broader feature set and higher unpacked size.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | cac | yargs |
|---|---|---|
| License | Both are under MIT, offering similar flexibility. | Both are under MIT, offering similar flexibility. |
| Bundle Size | ✓At 3.6 kB (gzip), cac is quite lightweight. | While larger at 34.4 kB (gzip), yargs offers more features. |
| Open Issues | ✓68 open issues reflect ongoing maintenance and potential areas of improvement. | 304 open issues suggest that more developers are encountering challenges. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓With 81.8 kB, cac is minimalistic. | 231.4 kB is larger, supporting more comprehensive features. |
| Framework Type | A minimal framework appropriate for straightforward CLI tools. | ✓A well-rounded framework excellent for complex command-line tools. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Simple and easy to grasp for beginners. | More complex, may require a deeper understanding to utilize fully. |
| Target Audience | Ideal for new developers or small-scale projects. | ✓Better suited for experienced developers working on larger applications. |
| Feature Richness | Focuses on simplicity, might lack advanced features. | ✓Packed with functionality, suitable for feature-heavy applications. |
| Version Stability | Version 6.7.14 shows ongoing updates and improvements. | ✓Version 18.0.0 indicates that it's modern but more mature in terms of features. |
| Download Popularity | 22.5M weekly downloads indicate solid but moderate use. | ✓147.0M weekly downloads show strong and widespread adoption. |
| Community Engagement | 2.9K stars and 110 forks suggest a good level of interest and community support. | ✓11.4K stars and 1.0K forks indicate a very active community. |