cac vs citty
Side-by-side comparison of cac and citty
- Weekly Downloads
- 22.4M
- Stars
- 2.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 68
- Forks
- 110
- Unpacked Size
- 81.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 14.0M
- Stars
- 1.1K
- Gzip Size
- 3.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 19h ago
- Open Issues
- 70
- Forks
- 37
- Unpacked Size
- 23.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
cac is a powerful framework well-suited for developers looking to build sophisticated command-line applications with a robust feature set. It boasts a larger user base and community support, making it a solid choice for teams aiming for reliability and extensive documentation.
In contrast, citty, while elegant and easier to use for simpler CLI needs, may not be the best choice for larger projects or teams looking for comprehensive capabilities. Developers who are new to CLI tools or working on small projects may find citty's lightweight nature more appealing and easier to integrate.
Considering the differences, if your project requires extensive capabilities and stability, cac is the preferable option. However, if the project scope is limited and simplicity is desired, citty could be sufficient despite its smaller community and ongoing development concerns.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | cac | citty |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | Slightly larger at 3.6 kB, which is manageable for larger apps | ✓Minimal at 3.0 kB, a plus for smaller tools |
| Open Issues | 68 open issues suggest active maintenance | 69 open issues may indicate similar levels of ongoing work |
| Scalability | ✓Designed for scalability in larger CLI applications | More suitable for simple, short-lived utilities |
| GitHub Forks | ✓Higher fork count of 110 suggests more experimentation and use | Lower at 36, indicating less community engagement |
| GitHub Stars | ✓Strong community recognition with 2.9K stars | Fewer stars at 1.1K, indicating a smaller user base |
| Last Updated | ✓Recently updated in July 2024, indicating active development | Last updated in February 2026, suggesting less frequent updates |
| Unpacked Size | Larger at 81.8 kB, potentially containing more features | ✓Smaller at 23.4 kB, which may limit capabilities |
| Learning Curve | Potentially steeper due to extensive features | ✓Easier to grasp for newcomers |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Significantly higher user engagement with 22.5M downloads | Still respectable but lower at 13.9M |
| Overall Positioning | ✓Robust framework ideal for complex CLI applications | Lightweight option suited for simpler CLI tools |
| Development Activity | ✓Active community involvement and contributions | Less community engagement may impact support |