citty vs commander
Side-by-side comparison of citty and commander
- Weekly Downloads
- 14.0M
- Stars
- 1.1K
- Gzip Size
- 3.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 19h ago
- Open Issues
- 70
- Forks
- 37
- Unpacked Size
- 23.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 281.9M
- Stars
- 27.9K
- Gzip Size
- 12.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 10
- Forks
- 1.7K
- Unpacked Size
- 208.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
Citty is designed for developers who appreciate a minimalist yet elegant approach to building command-line interfaces, making it a great choice for small to medium-scale projects. It offers a lightweight solution with a small unpacked size and a rapidly growing user base as indicated by its weekly downloads. In contrast, Commander is well-suited for larger applications and provides a comprehensive set of features for building more complex command-line tools effectively.
If your project requires a lightweight, straightforward CLI environment, citty may be the better choice due to its minimal overhead and focused tooling. Conversely, if you are working on a larger project where complex command handling is necessary and you need robust features with extensive community support, Commander would be a more fitting option. Consider the scale and specific requirements of your project before making a decision.
While citty shows promise, it is still relatively new and may require more support and community contributions over time. On the other hand, Commander has been around longer, but its last update was in 2015, which may indicate slower evolution compared to more recent packages. Weigh these factors when considering long-term maintenance and future-proofing your CLI solution.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | citty | commander |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license allows flexible use. | MIT license also provides flexibility. |
| Version | ✓Latest version is 0.2.0, indicating it is still evolving. | 14.0.3 is a mature version from 2015. |
| Description | Elegant CLI tool focused on simplicity. | ✓Comprehensive solution for complex CLI needs. |
| Open Issues | 69 open issues may raise concerns about support. | ✓0 open issues implies strong stability. |
| GitHub Forks | 36 forks suggest moderate community involvement. | ✓62 forks indicate more extensive community contributions. |
| GitHub Stars | 1.1K stars shows growing popularity. | 1.1K stars, indicating stable user interest. |
| Last Updated | ✓Last updated in February 2026, showing activity. | Last updated in April 2015, indicating potential stagnation. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Small at 23.4 kB, good for minimalistic applications. | Larger at 208.7 kB, reflective of comprehensive features. |
| Weekly Downloads | Limited to 13.9 million, demonstrating growth potential. | ✓High at 281.2 million, showcasing established usage. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 3.0 kB, enhancing performance. | Heavier at 12.0 kB, indicating more functionality. |
| Community Activity | ✓Emerging community with growing weekly downloads. | Established community but low recent activity. |