cac vs commander
Side-by-side comparison of cac and commander
- Weekly Downloads
- 22.4M
- Stars
- 2.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.6 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 68
- Forks
- 110
- Unpacked Size
- 81.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 281.9M
- Stars
- 27.9K
- Gzip Size
- 12.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 10
- Forks
- 1.7K
- Unpacked Size
- 208.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
cac is a well-structured framework for building command-line applications, best suited for developers seeking a lightweight solution with a modern approach. It attracts a moderate number of downloads and has a solid community backing, making it a good choice for projects requiring flexibility and ease of use.
commander, with its extensive usage and larger download counts, is more established but lacks recent updates. It is ideal for larger projects that need a robust set of features and comprehensive support for building complex command-line interfaces but may present challenges for new users due to its larger footprint and legacy code.
When deciding between the two, consider cac if you are starting fresh or want a lean and updated CMD approach. Conversely, if you are working on an established project that can leverage the reliability of commander without worrying about frequent updates, it may still be a viable choice.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | cac | commander |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT, promoting a permissive use. | MIT, also encouraging open-source development. |
| Version | ✓Recently updated with a newer version. | Older version may indicate lack of updates and features. |
| Categories | Category is CLI, fitting its purpose. | Also categorized as CLI, matching its functionality. |
| Description | Focused on building simple yet powerful CLI tools. | Offers a complete solution for command-line applications. |
| Open Issues | 68 open issues that may suggest challenges or needed improvements. | ✓0 open issues signify a potentially stable project. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓110 forks demonstrate active development. | 62 forks indicate moderate interest in changing the library. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓2.9K stars show a strong community engagement. | 1.1K indicates less community recognition. |
| Last Updated | ✓Updated as recently as July 2024, indicating active maintenance. | Last updated in April 2015, suggesting it may be stagnant. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓81.8 kB, making it lightweight for applications. | 208.7 kB size indicating a more complex structure. |
| Weekly Downloads | 22.5M indicating growing interest. | ✓High at 281.2M, suggesting widespread adoption. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓3.6 kB, which is minimal and efficient. | 12.0 kB, relatively larger for a CLI package. |