@chakra-ui/react vs @mantine/core
Side-by-side comparison of @chakra-ui/react and @mantine/core
- Weekly Downloads
- 984.9K
- Stars
- 40.2K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 9h ago
- Open Issues
- 19
- Forks
- 3.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.5 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.3M
- Stars
- 30.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 45
- Forks
- 2.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 12.0 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@chakra-ui/react is well-suited for projects that prioritize accessibility and responsive design in their UI components. With a strong emphasis on usability and a comprehensive design system, it serves developers looking to create visually appealing applications that meet high accessibility standards.
On the other hand, @mantine/core is ideal for projects where developer experience and usability are top priorities. It is particularly beneficial for teams familiar with TypeScript, as it offers a modern approach to component design while still ensuring accessibility and responsiveness. If your project size is larger and complexity increases, @mantine/core’s additional features may provide more value.
Consider the trade-offs in bundle size; @chakra-ui/react is smaller at 2.5 MB compared to @mantine/core's 12.0 MB. This can be crucial if performance is a key concern. Both packages are under the MIT license and offer similar features, but choosing one may come down to specific project requirements and the development team's familiarity with the frameworks they employ.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @chakra-ui/react | @mantine/core |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Smaller at 2.5 MB, making it efficient for performance-sensitive applications. | Larger at 12.0 MB, which may impact loading times. |
| Open Issues | ✓Few open issues (19) suggest a relatively stable package. | More open issues (45) may indicate areas requiring attention or improvement. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓40.2K stars suggest a significant level of community interest. | 30.5K stars show good popularity, though less than @chakra-ui/react. |
| Last Updated | Last updated in February 2026, implying recent maintenance. | Also updated in February 2026, showing active development. |
| Design System | ✓Comprehensive design system is central to its offerings. | Focus on usability but less extensive in predefined components. |
| Overall Focus | ✓Focuses on responsive and accessible design, ideal for diverse applications. | Emphasizes usability and developer experience for modern applications. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Accessible for beginners with clear documentation on UI components. | May require familiarity with hooks and TypeScript for a smooth experience. |
| Weekly Downloads | 972.2K downloads indicate solid usage, but lower than competitor. | ✓1.3M downloads reflect a strong user base and adoption. |
| TypeScript Support | Not explicitly mentioned, focus appears on React accessibility. | ✓Strong TypeScript support, ideal for TypeScript projects. |
| Developer Experience | Offers straightforward components for rapid development. | ✓Highlights usability, but requires more setup for full features. |
| Customization Options | Supports a variety of themes and custom styles. | Offers customizable components with a focus on practical design. |