@mantine/core vs @radix-ui/themes
Side-by-side comparison of @mantine/core and @radix-ui/themes
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.3M
- Stars
- 30.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 45
- Forks
- 2.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 12.0 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 462.7K
- Stars
- 8.1K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 150
- Forks
- 311
- Unpacked Size
- 4.9 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@mantine/core excels as a comprehensive React components library that prioritizes usability, accessibility, and an enhanced developer experience. It is well-suited for larger projects that require a robust set of UI components and strong support for TypeScript, making it a favorite among developers focused on scalability and maintaining a uniform design system across complex applications.
On the other hand, @radix-ui/themes specializes in theme development within the Radix ecosystem, providing a solid foundation for applications needing customizable visual styles. Given its moderate weekly downloads and targeted focus, @radix-ui/themes may appeal more to smaller teams or projects where accessibility and design consistency are critical, yet complexity and overhead must remain low.
While both libraries are built with accessibility in mind, @mantine/core's larger size and comprehensive capabilities may present a steeper learning curve. Conversely, developers looking for simplicity and quick implementation for themed applications might find @radix-ui/themes more manageable and easy to integrate without significant overhead.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @mantine/core | @radix-ui/themes |
|---|---|---|
| Usability | ✓Designed with usability as a core principle, enhancing developer experience | Simplifies theme application but offers limited usability features |
| Open Issues | ✓Fewer open issues suggest ongoing maintenance and responsiveness | Higher number of open issues may indicate less active management |
| Best Use Case | Ideal for complex applications requiring a diverse component set | ✓Best for projects needing accessibility-driven theming |
| Unpacked Size | Larger unpacked size may affect initial load time | ✓Smaller size benefits performance and loading speed |
| Learning Curve | Greater component variety may introduce complexity | ✓More straightforward, easier for quick startup projects |
| GitHub Activity | ✓High star count and active forks indicate robust community involvement | Lower engagement with fewer stars and forks |
| Component Variety | ✓Offers a vast array of components tailored for varied use cases | Focuses primarily on theme-related components |
| Download Frequency | ✓High weekly downloads indicate strong community adoption | Moderate downloads suggest niche usage |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Full support for TypeScript, aiding robust application development | Limited TypeScript integration |
| Theming Capabilities | Includes theming but less focused compared to @radix-ui/themes | ✓Specialized in theme development, offering extensive customization |
| Accessibility Support | ✓Strong emphasis on accessibility standards in components | Prioritizes accessible theming but less comprehensive component accessibility |