@radix-ui/themes vs antd
Side-by-side comparison of @radix-ui/themes and antd
- Weekly Downloads
- 462.7K
- Stars
- 8.1K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 150
- Forks
- 311
- Unpacked Size
- 4.9 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.4M
- Stars
- 97.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5h ago
- Open Issues
- 1.4K
- Forks
- 54.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 56.5 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@radix-ui/themes focuses on accessibility and theming, making it ideal for projects prioritizing design consistency and UI adaptability. It serves developers looking for a lightweight solution for theme development within React applications, especially those who value simplicity and a smaller footprint.
On the other hand, antd is a more comprehensive UI solution with a wide array of components and a robust design language, suited for larger-scale applications and enterprise-focused projects. Its higher weekly downloads and GitHub stats indicate a strong community and ongoing support, appealing to teams with varying levels of experience in React and UI design.
However, using antd involves a significantly larger bundle size, which might not be optimal for projects where performance and quick loading times are crucial. Developers should consider the scope of their project and the potential need for customization when choosing between these two options.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @radix-ui/themes | antd |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓150 open issues suggest moderate activity and maintenance demands. | 1.4K open issues may indicate more ongoing development challenges. |
| GitHub Stars | 8.1K stars indicate a solid niche following. | ✓97.5K stars demonstrate significant community interest and validation. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓4.9 MB, which is relatively lightweight for theme solutions. | 56.5 MB, which may lead to slower load times in resource-sensitive applications. |
| Team Experience | Suitable for teams focused on accessibility with a potential learning curve in theming. | ✓Offers a familiar design system for developers experienced with Ant Design. |
| Overall Use Case | Best for lightweight theming and accessibility-focused projects. | ✓Ideal for enterprise-level applications needing a comprehensive UI library. |
| Weekly Downloads | Stable but lower adoption with 453.3K weekly downloads. | ✓Higher popularity with 2.4M weekly downloads. |
| Community Support | Growing community but less extensive than antd. | ✓Large community with extensive resources and documentation. |
| Design Flexibility | ✓Allows for high customization in theming. | Provides a standardized design language, possibly limiting custom styling. |
| TypeScript Support | No specific mention of TypeScript support. | ✓Design geared towards TypeScript use, beneficial for TypeScript projects. |
| Component Diversity | Limited components focused primarily on theming. | ✓Extensive library of varied UI components for comprehensive design needs. |