@mui/material vs @radix-ui/themes
Side-by-side comparison of @mui/material and @radix-ui/themes
- Weekly Downloads
- 7.3M
- Stars
- 97.8K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 19h ago
- Open Issues
- 1.7K
- Forks
- 32.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 5.7 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 462.7K
- Stars
- 8.1K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 150
- Forks
- 311
- Unpacked Size
- 4.9 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@mui/material is a well-established React component library focused on implementing Material Design, making it ideal for teams looking to create visually appealing and consistent user interfaces. With high weekly downloads and significant community support indicated by its GitHub stars, it's suited for large-scale applications and projects requiring a comprehensive set of components.
In contrast, @radix-ui/themes offers a more niche solution tailored towards theme development and accessibility, making it a solid choice for developers prioritizing custom theming and accessibility features. For teams that are familiar with Radix UI's ecosystem or need to implement detailed theming, this package may serve them better, especially in smaller projects or as part of a broader design system.
When choosing between these two, consider project requirements: if you need a robust, production-ready component library with extensive resources, go with @mui/material. Alternatively, for projects centered on accessibility and design customization, @radix-ui/themes will be more beneficial, albeit with a smaller community and less momentum in terms of recent downloads and contributions.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @mui/material | @radix-ui/themes |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | 1.7K open issues may indicate areas for improvement. | ✓150 open issues suggest better maintenance. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2026-02-07, reflecting ongoing development. | Last updated on 2026-02-03, also actively maintained. |
| Unpacked Size | Larger size at 5.7 MB, potentially affecting loading times. | ✓Slightly smaller at 4.9 MB, which may benefit lighter applications. |
| User Adoption | ✓High adoption with 7.3M weekly downloads. | Lower adoption at 453.3K weekly downloads. |
| Learning Curve | ✓More straightforward given its popularity and resource availability. | May require some learning if unfamiliar with theme customization and accessibility principles. |
| Topics Covered | ✓Covers diverse topics including design-system and React components. | Focuses on themes and accessibility, serving a specific niche. |
| Community Support | ✓Strong community with 97.8K stars on GitHub. | Smaller community with 8.1K stars. |
| Development Focus | General UI component development aligning with Material Design. | ✓Specializes in theme and UI customization. |
| Overall Positioning | ✓Comprehensive library for Material Design applications. | Focused on theme development and accessibility. |
| Use Case Suitability | ✓Highly suitable for large, production-ready applications. | Best for projects needing specific theme customization and accessibility considerations. |
| Migration Considerations | ✓Easier integration due to widespread use and available documentation. | Migration would depend on specific theming needs and existing design systems. |