@mui/material vs antd

@mui/material excels in providing a versatile, out-of-the-box solution for building applications that align with Google's Material Design principles, making it a strong candidate for projects that prioritize a modern aesthetic and comprehensive component library. On the other hand, antd is tailored more toward enterprise applications, delivering a robust design language and a large set of components specifically crafted for complex interfaces and workflows.

When choosing between the two, consider your project's scope and team familiarity. If your focus is on rapid development with a streamlined design system, @mui/material may be more appropriate. However, if your team has experience with enterprise-grade applications and requires a wider range of components tailored to business needs, antd could be the better choice.

Additionally, the unpacked size of antd may pose challenges for performance-sensitive applications, whereas @mui/material offers a more lightweight option, suitable for smaller applications. Both frameworks, while solid in their offerings, might require careful consideration of specific needs and trade-offs to ensure optimal fit for your project.