@headlessui/react vs antd
Side-by-side comparison of @headlessui/react and antd
- Weekly Downloads
- 4.1M
- Stars
- 28.4K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 78
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 1.0 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.4M
- Stars
- 97.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5h ago
- Open Issues
- 1.4K
- Forks
- 54.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 56.5 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@headlessui/react focuses on providing unstyled, accessible UI components that work seamlessly with Tailwind CSS. It serves projects that prioritize accessibility and flexibility in design without enforcing a specific style.
antd, on the other hand, is an enterprise-class UI solution with a comprehensive set of pre-styled components suited for larger applications needing a cohesive design language. It excels in projects requiring a robust component library with extensive customization features.
When considering which package to use, opt for @headlessui/react if you have a smaller team or project needing minimalistic styles and focus on accessibility. Choose antd for larger applications where a consistent design system is paramount, keeping in mind the larger bundle size and learning curve involved in adopting its extensive features.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @headlessui/react | antd |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Minimal at 1.0 MB, lightweight for quick projects | Substantial at 56.5 MB, may affect load times |
| Open Issues | ✓78 open issues, relatively manageable | 1.4K open issues, indicating more ongoing work and potential maintenance challenges |
| Project Fit | ✓Ideal for smaller, highly tailored projects | Best suited for larger, enterprise-level applications |
| GitHub Forks | 1.2K forks, good level of community engagement | ✓54.5K forks, suggesting extensive customization and contributions |
| GitHub Stars | 28.4K stars, strong recognition among developers | ✓97.5K stars, indicating popularity and active community support |
| Last Updated | Updated last on 2025-12-19, indicating recent activity | ✓Last updated on 2026-02-07, showing more current maintenance |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easier to learn due to simplicity | Steeper learning curve because of its comprehensive feature set |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓4.1M, indicating high community interest | 2.4M, suggesting a healthy but smaller user base |
| Design Enforcement | ✓No enforced design, allows for any style | Enforces a design system, which could limit some flexibility |
| Accessibility Focus | ✓Designed specifically with a11y in mind | Accessibility is present but not the primary focus |
| Component Customization | ✓Highly customizable due to unstyled nature | Customizable but starts with a heavier design framework |