@headlessui/react vs @radix-ui/themes
Side-by-side comparison of @headlessui/react and @radix-ui/themes
- Weekly Downloads
- 4.1M
- Stars
- 28.4K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 78
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 1.0 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 462.7K
- Stars
- 8.1K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 150
- Forks
- 311
- Unpacked Size
- 4.9 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@headlessui/react is best suited for projects that prioritize accessibility and unstyled components, allowing for easy integration with Tailwind CSS. It serves developers looking for headless UI solutions where customization is key while maintaining a focus on a strong accessibility foundation.
In contrast, @radix-ui/themes targets those needing a robust theming solution within UI components, making it ideal for projects focused on design systems. For teams experienced in working with design frameworks, it provides a structured approach to theme development, though its larger size may be a consideration for lighter applications.
Migration to @radix-ui/themes might require adjustments in design and theming approaches, while @headlessui/react allows for more flexibility with styling. Therefore, if accessibility and minimal styling are primary concerns, @headlessui/react may be the preferable choice, whereas @radix-ui/themes excels in comprehensive design system implementations.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @headlessui/react | @radix-ui/themes |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓Fewer open issues (78), suggesting stability. | More open issues (150), which may indicate ongoing challenges. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓High at 1.2K, indicating active use and experimentation. | Fewer forks at 311, suggesting less experimentation. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓More popular with 28.4K stars, showing strong community support. | Lower at 8.1K stars, but still noteworthy. |
| Last Updated | ✓Updated more recently, indicating active maintenance. | Also updated recently but less frequently than @headlessui/react. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓More lightweight at 1.0 MB, better for performance. | Larger at 4.9 MB, potentially impacting load times. |
| Target Audience | Developers wanting unstyled, accessible components. | Design teams needing robust theming capabilities. |
| Styling Approach | ✓Focuses on unstyled components for customization. | Built around predefined themes and styles. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Significantly higher at 4.1M, indicating strong adoption. | Lower but respectable at 453.3K weekly downloads. |
| Overall Positioning | Best for accessibility-focused applications with headless UI components. | ✓Ideal for projects requiring a comprehensive theming solution. |
| Use Case Flexibility | ✓Highly flexible for various projects with Tailwind CSS. | Great for specific design systems and set themes. |
| Accessibility Built-in | ✓Strong emphasis on accessibility from the start. | Accessibility prioritized, but takes a back seat to theming. |