@ark-ui/react vs antd
Side-by-side comparison of @ark-ui/react and antd
- Weekly Downloads
- 408.2K
- Stars
- 5.0K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6h ago
- Open Issues
- 5
- Forks
- 185
- Unpacked Size
- 2.8 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.4M
- Stars
- 97.5K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5h ago
- Open Issues
- 1.4K
- Forks
- 54.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 56.5 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@ark-ui/react provides a lightweight and accessible set of unstyled components, making it ideal for developers who require flexibility in design and a headless approach to building interfaces. Its focus on state machines allows for sophisticated interaction patterns without being opinionated about styling, catering mostly to projects that need customization.
On the other hand, antd offers a comprehensive suite of pre-designed components that are highly suitable for enterprise applications where standardized design and quick implementation are prioritized. With a larger user base and extensive documentation, antd is advantageous for teams with less design experience looking to implement a cohesive UI quickly.
Developers should consider the project requirements carefully; if a customizable, unstyled approach is needed, especially in smaller projects, @ark-ui/react is a strong choice. Conversely, antd’s robust set of components may be more beneficial for larger projects aiming for rapid delivery and uniformity, despite its larger bundle size and more complex setup.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @ark-ui/react | antd |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Minimal at 2.8 MB, making it lightweight. | Substantially larger at 56.5 MB, potentially affecting load times. |
| Open Issues | ✓Only 4 open issues, indicating active maintenance and responsiveness. | 1.4K open issues might suggest more challenges to address. |
| GitHub Stars | 5.0K stars reflect solid community interest and support. | ✓97.5K stars highlight an extensive following and large community. |
| Last Updated | Latest update on 2026-02-05 shows active development. | Updated on 2026-02-07, also indicating ongoing support. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easier for developers familiar with building custom designs. | May have a steeper learning curve due to extensive features and customization options. |
| Weekly Downloads | 401.0K weekly downloads indicate a niche but growing usage. | ✓2.4M weekly downloads suggest widespread adoption in enterprise settings. |
| TypeScript Support | Offers support aligning with modern JavaScript practices. | ✓Comprehensive TypeScript support for type safety in larger applications. |
| Overall Positioning | Best for projects needing customizable, unstyled components. | ✓Ideal for enterprise applications with standardized UI needs. |