@ark-ui/react vs @mui/material
Side-by-side comparison of @ark-ui/react and @mui/material
- Weekly Downloads
- 408.2K
- Stars
- 5.0K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6h ago
- Open Issues
- 5
- Forks
- 185
- Unpacked Size
- 2.8 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 7.3M
- Stars
- 97.8K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 19h ago
- Open Issues
- 1.7K
- Forks
- 32.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 5.7 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@ark-ui/react offers a lightweight solution for building UI components with a focus on accessibility and unstyled elements, making it ideal for developers who want a high degree of customization and control. In contrast, @mui/material provides a robust implementation of Google's Material Design, offering a comprehensive suite of pre-styled components suited for rapid development across various project scales.
If your project requires a quick start with a polished design, @mui/material might be the preferable choice due to its extensive component library and active community support. On the other hand, @ark-ui/react is better suited for projects where design flexibility and accessibility are prioritized, particularly if your team has the experience to implement custom styling and components from the ground up.
It's also worth considering the differences in download and support metrics; while @mui/material has significantly more weekly downloads and GitHub stars, which indicates broader adoption and community engagement, @ark-ui/react's simpler, headless architecture could lead to faster onboarding for developers looking to branch into custom designs without bloat.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @ark-ui/react | @mui/material |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓Only 4 open issues, indicating a stable release with good maintenance. | 1.7K open issues suggest many ongoing developments and discussions. |
| Performance | ✓Minimal dependencies enhance performance and loading times. | May include additional components that impact performance a bit. |
| GitHub Forks | 185 forks signify some interest in customization. | ✓32.8K forks suggest extensive community engagement and custom implementations. |
| GitHub Stars | 5.0K stars denote a modest following. | ✓97.8K stars reflect a widely-recognized library. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Lightweight at 2.8 MB, which is beneficial for performance. | 5.7 MB may introduce additional bloat for applications. |
| Learning Curve | May require more effort to style and customize components. | ✓Straightforward for teams familiar with Material Design. |
| Weekly Downloads | 401.0K, indicating a smaller yet dedicated user base. | ✓7.3M, showing much broader community adoption. |
| Overall Positioning | Focused on unstyled, accessible components ideal for customization. | ✓Comprehensive library implementing Material Design for quicker development. |
| Customization Flexibility | ✓Highly customizable due to its unstyled nature. | Limited flexibility compared to headless components. |
| Design System Compatibility | Supports various frameworks, not limited to React. | ✓Tailored specifically for Material Design, ensuring strong cohesion there. |
| Team Experience Requirement | Best for teams comfortable with building and styling components. | ✓Suitable for teams looking for out-of-the-box solutions. |