@ark-ui/react vs @chakra-ui/react
Side-by-side comparison of @ark-ui/react and @chakra-ui/react
- Weekly Downloads
- 408.2K
- Stars
- 5.0K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 6h ago
- Open Issues
- 5
- Forks
- 185
- Unpacked Size
- 2.8 MB
- Weekly Downloads
- 984.9K
- Stars
- 40.2K
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 9h ago
- Open Issues
- 19
- Forks
- 3.6K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.5 MB
Download Trends
Verdict
@ark-ui/react provides a collection of unstyled, accessible UI components, which makes it ideal for projects requiring a high degree of customization while focusing on minimal design. It serves developers looking to implement their own styles and control component behavior using state machines. In contrast, @chakra-ui/react offers responsive and styled UI components, catering to teams that prefer a more opinionated design system that integrates easily with Emotion.
For teams working on smaller projects or those with less experience in design systems, @chakra-ui/react may provide a quicker setup due to its built-in styling capabilities. However, for larger applications or those by experienced developers who prioritize design flexibility and customizability, @ark-ui/react is a suitable choice. Project requirements will dictate the best approach, with @chakra-ui/react being effective for rapid prototyping while @ark-ui/react shines in fully tailored implementations.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @ark-ui/react | @chakra-ui/react |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Focuses on unstyled, accessible components suitable for high customization. | ✓Provides responsive and styled components aimed at ease of use. |
| Open Issues | ✓Only 4 open issues showing effective maintenance and responsiveness. | 19 open issues hint at potential area for improvement. |
| GitHub Stars | 5.0K stars reflect a solid but smaller community. | ✓40.2K stars indicate a much larger community and support base. |
| Customization | ✓Highly customizable for advanced users. | Customization is limited to predefined styles and themes. |
| Unpacked Size | At 2.8 MB, slightly larger which may impact initial load time. | ✓Smaller at 2.5 MB leading to potentially faster initial load times. |
| Learning Curve | May have a steeper learning curve due to its unstyled nature. | ✓More straightforward for beginners with styled components. |
| Weekly Downloads | Consistent usage with 401.0K weekly downloads. | ✓More popular with 972.2K weekly downloads indicating broader adoption. |
| Community Support | Active community but smaller than rival's. | ✓Large community support aids in troubleshooting and resources. |
| Design Philosophy | Headless design promotes developer control and flexibility. | Styled components encourage rapid development and standardization. |
| Responsive Design Support | No inherent responsive styles, reliant on user implementation. | ✓Built-in responsive design features facilitate adaptive layouts. |
| Suitability for Rapid Development | Less suited for rapid development projects due to unstyled nature. | ✓Excellent for quick iterations and prototypes. |