@formatjs/intl vs next-intl
Side-by-side comparison of @formatjs/intl and next-intl
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.5M
- Stars
- 14.7K
- Gzip Size
- 13.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 19m ago
- Open Issues
- 21
- Forks
- 1.4K
- Unpacked Size
- 43.9 kB
- Dependencies
- 8
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.5M
- Stars
- 4.1K
- Gzip Size
- 16.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2d ago
- Open Issues
- 46
- Forks
- 345
- Unpacked Size
- 390.2 kB
- Dependencies
- 10
Download Trends
Verdict
@formatjs/intl excels at providing a comprehensive API for internationalization across diverse JavaScript applications, making it well-suited for developers who require detailed formatting options for dates, numbers, and strings, including robust pluralization and translation handling. In contrast, next-intl is specifically designed for integration with Next.js applications, focusing on a more streamlined experience for developers already within that ecosystem.
When selecting between them, consider your project's size and framework. If you are building a Next.js application and prioritize simplicity in implementation, next-intl is the preferred choice. However, for broader JavaScript applications where rich internationalization features are necessary, @formatjs/intl is likely to be the better option.
Keep in mind that migrating projects to next-intl from @formatjs/intl may require adjustments in code due to its Next.js-centric functionality, while moving from next-intl to @formatjs/intl may lead to a more extensive overhaul to achieve the same level of formatting capabilities.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @formatjs/intl | next-intl |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | MIT license ensures permissiveness and ease of use. | Also under MIT, offering similar usage freedom. |
| Focus Area | Focuses broadly on various applications requiring internationalization. | ✓Specialized in Next.js ecosystem, optimizing for that use case. |
| Open Issues | ✓Fewer open issues can indicate a more stable and maintained package. | More open issues may suggest ongoing challenges. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓More forks may imply greater interest in customizing or extending the library. | Fewer forks suggest lower interest in adaptation. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓A significant number of stars indicates a strong reputation among developers. | Fewer stars suggest a less established presence. |
| Last Updated | Recently updated, showing continued maintenance and support. | Very recent updates indicate active development. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact size at 43.9 kB allows for efficient loading and performance. | Larger size at 390.2 kB may affect loading times in specific contexts. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Higher weekly downloads signal a larger user base and community support. | Lower downloads may imply a smaller yet focused user group. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Smaller bundle size of 13.0 kB enhances performance in production builds. | Bigger bundle size of 16.5 kB could lead to longer load times. |
| TypeScript Support | Good TypeScript support generally, aiding in type safety. | Also supports TypeScript, particularly in Next.js setups. |
| Overall Positioning | ✓Comprehensive internationalization for diverse JavaScript applications. | Tailored for Next.js applications with a simpler integration approach. |
| Developer Experience | Rich features may have a steeper learning curve for newcomers. | ✓Simpler setup aligns well with Next.js developers' expectations. |