@heroicons/react vs @phosphor-icons/react
Side-by-side comparison of @heroicons/react and @phosphor-icons/react
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.4M
- Stars
- 23.3K
- Gzip Size
- 224 B
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4mo ago
- Open Issues
- 1
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 3.7 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 760.6K
- Stars
- 1.6K
- Gzip Size
- —
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 19
- Forks
- 80
- Unpacked Size
- 33.0 MB
- Dependencies
- —
Download Trends
Verdict
@heroicons/react excels in delivering a minimalist and clean icon library ideal for projects that utilize Tailwind CSS, attracting a large user base evident in its high weekly downloads and GitHub activity. Conversely, @phosphor-icons/react offers a broader selection of icons, catering to developers who prefer a more extensive icon toolkit that can fit various design needs.
For smaller projects or those already aligned with Tailwind CSS, @heroicons/react may present a more efficient option due to its lightweight size and ease of integration. Larger teams or projects that require diverse icon choices may benefit from @phosphor-icons/react, despite its larger unpacked size, as it provides a wide-ranging icon library that can adapt to different applications.
While both libraries are built under the MIT license and cater to React, developers should consider the ongoing maintenance of open issues, where @phosphor-icons/react has significantly more open issues than @heroicons/react. Overall, the choice hinges on specific project needs and integration preferences, rather than a clear superiority between the two libraries.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @heroicons/react | @phosphor-icons/react |
|---|---|---|
| Version | ✓Latest version is 2.2.0, reflecting recent updates and enhancements. | Latest version is 2.1.10, which is slightly older. |
| Maintenance | ✓Regularly updated with fewer issues, indicating robust support. | More open issues lead to considerations for future maintenance challenges. |
| Open Issues | ✓Only 1 open issue suggests high stability and better maintenance. | 19 open issues may indicate more challenges or areas needing attention. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓1.3K forks indicate active engagement and potential contributions. | 80 forks show limited developer engagement in comparison. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓23.3K stars reflect a strong interest and approval from developers. | 1.6K stars, while positive, show a lesser level of notoriety. |
| Icon Variety | Focused icon set suitable for Tailwind-related projects. | ✓Offers a broad range of icons catering to various styles and needs. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓At 3.7 MB, it remains user-friendly and lightweight for projects. | 33.0 MB indicates a heavier and bulkier library. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓2.4M downloads indicate high usage and community trust. | 758.1K downloads suggest a smaller but dedicated user base. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Very lightweight at 224 B, contributing to faster load times. | Size not specified, likely larger due to the unpacked size. |
| Project Suitability | Ideal for smaller projects or those within the Tailwind ecosystem. | Better suited for larger projects requiring a diverse icon collection. |
| Fit for Tailwind CSS | ✓Optimally designed for Tailwind projects, enhancing synergy. | Not specifically designed for Tailwind, potentially requiring additional styling efforts. |