COMPARISON · ICONS

@phosphor-icons/react vs. @tabler/icons-react

Side-by-side comparison · 8 metrics · 15 criteria

@phosphor-icons/react v2.1.10 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
2.4M
Stars
1.7K
Gzip Size
1.1 MB
License
MIT
Last Updated
1y ago
Open Issues
20
Forks
83
Unpacked Size
33.0 MB
@tabler/icons-react v3.46.0 · MIT
Weekly Downloads
2.4M
Stars
21.3K
Gzip Size
529.2 kB
License
MIT
Last Updated
5mo ago
Open Issues
113
Forks
1.2K
Unpacked Size
66.0 MB
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

@phosphor-icons/react vs @tabler/icons-react downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for @phosphor-icons/react and @tabler/icons-react2 download series from Aug 2025 to Jul 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.03.0M5.9M8.9M11.9MAug 2025NovFebMayJul 2026
@phosphor-icons/react
@tabler/icons-react
FEATURE COMPARISON

Criteria — @phosphor-icons/react vs @tabler/icons-react

Forks on GitHub
@phosphor-icons/react
83 forks, suggesting moderate interest in forking or contributing.
@tabler/icons-react
1.2K forks, indicating high interest and a strong community involvement in adapting the project.
File Size on Disk
@phosphor-icons/react
Unpacked size is 33.0 MB, indicating a larger asset package.
@tabler/icons-react
Unpacked size is 66.0 MB, indicating a significantly larger asset package.
Design Consistency
@phosphor-icons/react
Strong emphasis on a unified aesthetic, facilitating a consistent visual language.
@tabler/icons-react
Offers variety, which can be adapted for different contexts but might require more effort for strict visual unity.
Performance Impact
@phosphor-icons/react
Larger bundle size may impact initial load times in highly optimized applications.
@tabler/icons-react
Smaller size is highly beneficial for optimizing web performance and reducing load times.
Icon Set Philosophy
@phosphor-icons/react
Focuses on a clean, friendly, and composable icon family with a curated feel.
@tabler/icons-react
Provides an extensive set of high-quality, diverse SVG icons for broad application use.
Bundle Size Efficiency
@phosphor-icons/react
Bundled size is 1.1 MB (gzip), which is substantial but manageable.
@tabler/icons-react
Bundled size is 529.2 kB (gzip), making it significantly more lightweight for performance-critical applications.
Icon Comprehensiveness
@phosphor-icons/react
Provides a well-selected, cohesive set of icons suitable for many common use cases.
@tabler/icons-react
Offers a very large and diverse library, catering to a wider array of specific needs and styles.
Third-Party Dependencies
@phosphor-icons/react
No explicit mention of dependencies, implying a minimal footprint.
@tabler/icons-react
No explicit mention of dependencies, implying a minimal footprint.
Popularity - GitHub Stars
@phosphor-icons/react
Good traction with 1.7K stars, indicating solid community appreciation.
@tabler/icons-react
Very high popularity with 21.2K stars, showing extensive community endorsement.
API Design and Integration
@phosphor-icons/react
Offers a clean, React-centric API promoting seamless integration and composability.
@tabler/icons-react
Designed for easy import and usage of a vast number of individual icons.
Icon Management Philosophy
@phosphor-icons/react
Presents icons as a cohesive family, encouraging a unified approach.
@tabler/icons-react
Provides icons as a comprehensive collection of individual assets, emphasizing choice and breadth.
Community Engagement - Issues
@phosphor-icons/react
Low number of open issues (20), suggesting good stability and maintenance.
@tabler/icons-react
Higher number of open issues (113), indicating active discussion and potential for community contributions or bugs.
Project Suitability - Design Systems
@phosphor-icons/react
Excellent for design systems prioritizing a curated, consistent look and feel.
@tabler/icons-react
Can be adapted for design systems but requires careful selection to maintain visual coherence.
Developer Experience - Learning Curve
@phosphor-icons/react
Intuitive and straightforward for React developers due to its clean API and design.
@tabler/icons-react
Accessible with clear documentation and a vast library, though initial exploration might take longer.
Project Suitability - Broad Applications
@phosphor-icons/react
Suitable for many web projects, but might not cover highly niche icon requirements.
@tabler/icons-react
Ideal for projects needing a vast selection of icons across diverse functionalities and styles.
VERDICT

While both @phosphor-icons/react and @tabler/icons-react serve the purpose of providing high-quality SVG icons for React applications, they differ in their underlying philosophies and how they approach icon management, which can influence your choice based on project needs and developer preferences. @phosphor-icons/react emphasizes a clean, friendly, and highly composable icon family, making it an excellent choice for projects that prioritize a consistent and modern visual language. Its design philosophy is geared towards developers who appreciate a well-defined design system and want icons that integrate seamlessly without being overly complex.

@tabler/icons-react, on the other hand, offers an extensive set of high-quality SVG icons, with a strong focus on providing a vast library for diverse use cases. It caters to developers who need a broad range of icons for various applications, from dashboards to general user interfaces, and value a comprehensive collection that is easily accessible. The project's generous MIT license and open nature further enhance its appeal for widespread adoption.

A key architectural difference lies in their distribution and composition. @phosphor-icons/react is designed as a cohesive family, suggesting a more unified approach to icon sets and potentially easier management of a consistent visual style across an application. This can lead to a more curated developer experience, where the icons feel like a natural extension of the design system itself. The emphasis is on a deliberate and artfully crafted collection.

Conversely, @tabler/icons-react presents itself as a large collection of individual icons, offering flexibility and breadth. This approach means developers can pick and choose exactly which icons they need, potentially leading to a more granular integration. While both ultimately deliver SVG icons, the perceived structure and organization can impact how developers interact with and select icons, particularly in large-scale projects with diverse needs.

Regarding developer experience, @phosphor-icons/react offers a clean API and a focus on React integration, typically leading to a straightforward learning curve for React developers. Its design seems to prioritize ease of use and predictable behavior within the React environment. Developers can expect minimal friction in integrating these icons into their components, thanks to its well-structured and intuitive design.

@tabler/icons-react also provides a robust developer experience, especially given its vast icon library. While the sheer number of icons might initially seem daunting, the package is designed for easy import and use. The extensive MIT license and clear documentation contribute positively to its adoption, making it accessible for developers looking for readily available icon solutions without complex licensing considerations. It aims to be a go-to resource for almost any project requirement.

Performance-wise, @tabler/icons-react demonstrates a significant advantage in terms of bundle size. With a gzipped bundle size of 529.2 kB compared to @phosphor-icons/react's 1.1 MB, it is considerably more lightweight. This smaller footprint can be critical for applications where every kilobyte counts, such as performance-sensitive web apps, mobile experiences, or even server-rendered applications where initial load times are paramount. Developers prioritizing lean builds will find @tabler/icons-react more appealing.

When choosing between the two, consider the scope of your project. If you are building a new application with a strong emphasis on a consistent, curated design language and value a cohesive icon set, @phosphor-icons/react might be the better fit. Its design feels intentional and art-directed, suitable for branding-focused projects or design systems. Its smaller number of meticulously crafted icons can foster a stronger visual identity.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

RELATED COMPARISONS 4
@heroicons/react vs @phosphor-icons/react ★ 25.4K · 5.5M/wk @phosphor-icons/react vs lucide-react ★ 25.5K · 79.5M/wk @heroicons/react vs @tabler/icons-react ★ 45.0K · 5.5M/wk @tabler/icons-react vs lucide-react ★ 45.1K · 79.5M/wk