jotai vs recoil
Side-by-side comparison of jotai and recoil
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 21.0K
- Gzip Size
- 6.8 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 17h ago
- Open Issues
- 6
- Forks
- 703
- Unpacked Size
- 507.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
- Weekly Downloads
- 470.5K
- Stars
- 19.5K
- Gzip Size
- 29.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 323
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 3
Download Trends
Verdict
jotai is a lightweight and primitive state management solution specifically tailored for React applications. It focuses on simplicity and minimalism, making it ideal for developers looking for a flexible option to manage state in smaller or more dynamic applications.
In contrast, recoil offers a more comprehensive state management experience, suitable for larger applications that may require more intricate state interactions. If your team is composed of more experienced developers who can handle a slightly steeper learning curve, recoil may be beneficial due to its extensive features.
When considering migration, jotai's smaller bundle size and fewer open issues may appeal to teams looking to minimize overhead, while recoil's larger library size could be a trade-off if advanced state management capabilities are necessary for the project scope.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | jotai | recoil |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT License, promoting open-source collaboration. | MIT License, similarly open-source. |
| Version | ✓Latest stable version 2.17.1. | Older version 0.7.7. |
| Use Cases | ✓Best for small to medium-sized applications. | More suited for complex, larger applications. |
| Description | Primitive and flexible state management tailored for React. | A comprehensive state management library for React. |
| Open Issues | ✓Only 5 open issues, reflecting good maintenance. | 323 open issues, suggesting potential concerns. |
| GitHub Forks | 703 forks, indicating engagement and experimentation. | ✓1.2K forks, showing more extensive exploration. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓21.0K stars, showcasing significant popularity. | 19.5K stars, indicating solid community interest. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Smaller size at 507.8 kB, beneficial for performance. | Larger unpacked size at 2.2 MB, which may affect load times. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easier learning curve, suitable for novice developers. | Extra features lead to a steeper learning curve. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High at 2.7M, indicating strong community adoption. | Moderate, at 471.1K, showing decent usage. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 6.8 kB, optimizing load performance. | Larger at 29.5 kB, potentially impacting speed. |
| TypeScript Support | Good TypeScript support, ensuring type safety. | Solid TypeScript support for strong typing. |