nanostores vs redux
Side-by-side comparison of nanostores and redux
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.4M
- Stars
- 7.0K
- Gzip Size
- 2.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 29
- Forks
- 138
- Unpacked Size
- 48.2 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 61.5K
- Gzip Size
- 1.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 44
- Forks
- 15.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 289.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
nanostores is suited for smaller projects or when minimal footprint is essential, targeting developers who favor an ultra-lightweight state management solution. In contrast, redux is a robust choice for larger applications needing a predictable state container and a more extensive ecosystem.
For projects with simpler state management needs, particularly if the team values a small learning curve and fast implementation, nanostores is a more fitting choice. However, for larger teams or applications requiring advanced state management features, middleware capabilities, and community support, redux stands out.
Developers migrating from traditional state management methods to a more modern approach may find the transition to nanostores smoother due to its atomic design. Conversely, transitioning to or from redux can involve more overhead due to its comprehensive nature and additional setup requirements.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | nanostores | redux |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Very small at 2.0 kB, suitable for performance-sensitive applications. | Compact at 1.4 kB but larger than nanostores. |
| Open Issues | ✓Fewer open issues (28) suggest a more stable package. | Higher open issues (43) could indicate ongoing development challenges. |
| GitHub Stars | 7.0K stars, reflecting a moderate level of popularity. | ✓61.4K stars, showcasing a significantly larger following and community interest. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓48.2 kB, small for quick load times. | 289.8 kB, indicating more comprehensive features but larger footprint. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Low learning curve; easy to get started with. | Moderate learning curve; may require more time to understand fully. |
| Weekly Downloads | 1.3M downloads, indicating a smaller user base. | ✓Strong activity with 21.6M downloads, suggesting a robust community. |
| Version Stability | Version 1.1.0, indicating it's relatively new. | ✓Version 5.0.1 boasts a longer history of updates and stability. |
| Atomic Store Feature | ✓Offers atomic stores for efficient updates and tree-shaking. | Does not focus on atomic stores, rather a single predictive model. |
| Overall Usage Context | Ideal for small-scale, lightweight applications. | ✓Best for large applications needing structured state management. |
| Ecosystem and Community Support | Limited ecosystem, primarily focused on state management. | ✓Extensive ecosystem with numerous middlewares and libraries available. |