mobx vs nanostores
Side-by-side comparison of mobx and nanostores
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 28.2K
- Gzip Size
- 18.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 83
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.4M
- Stars
- 7.0K
- Gzip Size
- 2.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 29
- Forks
- 138
- Unpacked Size
- 48.2 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
mobx excels in delivering a comprehensive state management solution suitable for larger applications that require scalability and robust features, serving well teams with experience in React and TypeScript. In contrast, nanostores is tailored for smaller projects or teams looking for a lightweight state management solution with minimal footprint, benefiting those who prioritize performance and simplicity.
For small to medium-sized projects, particularly when working with frameworks like React or Vue, nanostores offers a clear advantage with its tiny bundle size and atomic tree-shakable stores. However, for more complex state management needs in larger applications, mobx is the stronger choice due to its rich set of features and greater community support, as evidenced by its significantly higher number of weekly downloads and GitHub stars.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | mobx | nanostores |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT License, allowing flexibility in usage. | MIT License, providing open-source advantages. |
| Version | ✓Latest version 6.15.0 offers advanced features. | Version 1.1.0 is newer but less mature. |
| Description | Comprehensive state management solution for scalable apps. | ✓Lightweight state manager focusing on minimal size and performance. |
| Open Issues | 83 open issues indicate some ongoing challenges. | ✓28 issues reflect a relatively stable project. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓28.2K stars reflect a large, engaged community. | 7.0K stars suggest a smaller but growing community. |
| Unpacked Size | 4.3 MB may be substantial for certain projects. | ✓Small at 48.2 kB, contributing to efficient resource use. |
| Learning Curve | May have a steeper learning curve due to features. | ✓Easier to get started with a simpler API. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓2.8M weekly downloads indicate strong adoption. | 1.3M downloads show a decent but smaller user base. |
| Community Support | ✓High community engagement with many resources available. | Smaller community, fewer resources can be a limitation. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Larger at 18.5 kB which may affect performance. | ✓Very lightweight at 2.0 kB, ideal for small apps. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Strong TypeScript support adding to robustness. | Basic TypeScript compatibility but less comprehensive. |