mobx vs xstate
Side-by-side comparison of mobx and xstate
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 28.2K
- Gzip Size
- 18.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 83
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.4M
- Stars
- 29.2K
- Gzip Size
- 14.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 169
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
mobx excels in simple and scalable state management, making it an ideal choice for projects where data architecture needs to be straightforward and maintainable. It serves developers looking for a reactive programming approach integrated seamlessly with React and TypeScript.
On the other hand, xstate is tailored for complex state management scenarios, especially in applications that can benefit from using finite state machines and statecharts. It is suitable for teams that require robust orchestration of state transitions and workflows, particularly in larger or more intricate applications.
When considering migration or integration, developers should note that switching from mobx to xstate could require a steeper learning curve due to xstate's finite state machine model, which offers more structure but may be overwhelming for simpler use cases. Conversely, for teams with existing familiarity with reactive programming concepts, transitioning to mobx may be more straightforward and less disruptive.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | mobx | xstate |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Focuses on simple, scalable state management. | Offers finite state machines and statecharts for complex state management. |
| Open Issues | ✓83 open issues indicate a manageable level of outstanding work. | 169 open issues suggest more ongoing challenges to address. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓1.8K forks suggest active development and experimentation. | 1.3K forks show community engagement but less than mobx. |
| GitHub Stars | 28.2K stars demonstrate significant popularity and community support. | ✓29.2K stars reflect slightly higher interest from developers. |
| Last Updated | Latest version updated on 2026-01-04, indicating active maintenance. | ✓Most recent update on 2026-02-06, showing ongoing development. |
| Unpacked Size | Larger at 4.3 MB, which may impact performance in larger bundles. | ✓Smaller at 2.2 MB, potentially better for performance-sensitive applications. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easier for developers familiar with standard state management techniques. | Requires understanding of finite state machines, which can be challenging for beginners. |
| Weekly Downloads | 2.8M downloads indicate solid community usage. | ✓3.4M downloads suggest a higher level of adoption. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | At 18.5 kB, it is relatively larger compared to other packages. | ✓14.4 kB is smaller, offering a compact solution for projects. |
| TypeScript Support | Good TypeScript support, making it suitable for modern applications. | Also provides robust TypeScript integration, attracting developers in that ecosystem. |
| Optimized for Smaller Projects | ✓Ideal for smaller applications or simpler state management needs. | Best for more complex solutions requiring intricate state management. |