@reduxjs/toolkit vs mobx
Side-by-side comparison of @reduxjs/toolkit and mobx
- Weekly Downloads
- 10.9M
- Stars
- 11.2K
- Gzip Size
- 15.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 13h ago
- Open Issues
- 255
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 7.0 MB
- Dependencies
- 5
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 28.2K
- Gzip Size
- 18.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 83
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
Both @reduxjs/toolkit and mobx are popular state management solutions, serving distinct needs in application development. @reduxjs/toolkit is geared towards developers who prefer a structured, opinionated approach to managing state with Redux, while mobx offers a more flexible and reactive approach that simplifies state modeling in applications, especially those utilizing React.
For larger projects or teams already familiar with Redux patterns, @reduxjs/toolkit might be the better choice due to its comprehensive toolset and strong community support. On the other hand, for smaller projects or teams looking for a lighter, more straightforward way to handle state that requires less boilerplate, mobx presents an attractive option with its simplicity and minimal configuration.
Migration from one to the other may involve substantial changes in how state is managed due to their differing philosophies. Developers should carefully consider their application architecture and team experience before making a decision, as the paradigms of state management in @reduxjs/toolkit and mobx can significantly impact development workflow and maintainability.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @reduxjs/toolkit | mobx |
|---|---|---|
| Flexibility | Less flexible due to its structured approach but highly reliable. | ✓Extremely flexible, allowing for diverse state management approaches. |
| Open Issues | 254 open issues indicate ongoing development and community engagement. | ✓83 open issues suggest a potentially more stable or mature package. |
| Performance | Efficient in managing large-scale applications with complex state. | Excellent for smaller applications or those that can leverage its reactivity. |
| GitHub Stars | 11.2K stars indicating a solid level of interest and community backing. | ✓High engagement with 28.2K stars, suggesting strong popularity among developers. |
| Unpacked Size | 7.0 MB, which may contribute to larger application bundle sizes. | ✓Smaller at 4.3 MB, potentially maintaining lower resource consumption. |
| Learning Curve | Can be steeper for beginners due to the Redux ecosystem. | ✓Generally easier to grasp for those familiar with reactive programming. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Popular with 10.9M weekly downloads reflecting strong community adoption. | Less popular but still significant at 2.8M downloads. |
| Community Support | ✓Well-documented with a large and active community. | Strong community as well, but with potentially fewer resources than @reduxjs/toolkit. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓15.0 kB is relatively lightweight for its capabilities. | 18.5 kB is slightly larger, which might affect performance in constrained environments. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Strong TypeScript support, fitting well with modern development practices. | Also provides TypeScript support but may require more configuration. |
| Overall Positioning | Structured and opinionated state management for Redux. | Flexible, reactive state management with less boilerplate. |