@reduxjs/toolkit vs xstate
Side-by-side comparison of @reduxjs/toolkit and xstate
- Weekly Downloads
- 10.9M
- Stars
- 11.2K
- Gzip Size
- 15.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 13h ago
- Open Issues
- 255
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 7.0 MB
- Dependencies
- 5
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.4M
- Stars
- 29.2K
- Gzip Size
- 14.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 169
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
@reduxjs/toolkit is designed specifically for developers seeking a comprehensive solution to manage application state using Redux. It simplifies the initial setup and best practices for Redux, making it a great fit for teams looking for a structured approach to state management in larger applications.
On the other hand, xstate excels in scenarios where complex state logic is required, particularly when working with finite state machines and statecharts. It is ideal for projects needing orchestration of states and transitions, making it suitable for teams familiar with advanced state management concepts.
When considering trade-offs, @reduxjs/toolkit has a larger footprint and may feel overwhelming for smaller projects, while xstate offers a lighter package size. Additionally, developers may need to adopt different mindset and patterns when transitioning to xstate, which could impact easing into the integration process.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @reduxjs/toolkit | xstate |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing | Open source under MIT license, which allows modification and distribution. | Also licensed under MIT, ensuring similar freedoms. |
| Bundle Size | Moderately sized at 15.0 kB gzip, which could affect load times slightly. | ✓Slightly smaller at 14.4 kB gzip, providing a minor advantage in terms of size. |
| Open Issues | Moderate number of open issues at 254, suggesting ongoing development but potential for stability concerns. | ✓Fewer open issues at 169, potentially indicating a more stable library. |
| GitHub Stars | Well-received with 11.2K stars reflecting community interest. | ✓More popular at 29.2K stars, indicating broader appeal among developers. |
| Use Case Fit | Best suited for Redux-centric applications requiring structured state management. | Ideal for applications needing complex state management and visualizations. |
| Unpacked Size | Larger at 7.0 MB, which may contribute to a more extensive installation footprint. | ✓Smaller at 2.2 MB, appealing for projects concerned with installation size. |
| Learning Curve | Requires familiarity with Redux concepts, which may have a steeper learning curve for beginners. | Needs understanding of state machines, which can be complex for developers new to the paradigm. |
| Team Experience | Best for teams with prior experience in Redux or needing structured guidelines. | Better suited for those with a good grasp of state machines or requiring state management in intricate applications. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High adoption with 10.9M weekly downloads, indicating strong community support. | Solid usage with 3.4M weekly downloads, but not as widespread as @reduxjs/toolkit. |