mobx vs zustand
Side-by-side comparison of mobx and zustand
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 28.2K
- Gzip Size
- 18.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 83
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 56.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 4
- Forks
- 1.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 95.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
mobx excels in complex, larger applications requiring scalable state management and offers a more structured approach to reactive programming. Its significant presence in the GitHub community, with a large number of stars and forks, highlights its popularity and reliability in production environments.
On the other hand, zustand is tailored for simpler use cases with a focus on minimalism and performance. Its smaller bundle size and higher weekly downloads suggest it is favorably received in the React community and is suitable for projects where lightweight state management is paramount.
If you are migrating from more complex state management patterns, mobx may require a steeper learning curve, whereas zustand offers a quicker setup, potentially reducing onboarding time for new developers on your team.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | mobx | zustand |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | Relatively large at 18.5 kB, which may impact performance. | ✓Very small at 3.5 kB, offering performance benefits in load times. |
| Flexibility | ✓Highly flexible, catering to diverse state management scenarios. | Less flexible but faster to implement out-of-the-box solutions. |
| Open Issues | Has 83 open issues, indicating ongoing development and potential concerns. | ✓Only 3 open issues, suggesting stability and responsiveness from the maintainers. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2026-01-04, indicating ongoing support. | ✓More recently updated on 2026-02-03, suggesting active development. |
| Unpacked Size | More substantial at 4.3 MB, suggesting a more complex feature set. | ✓Minimal at 95.0 kB, indicating focus on essential features. |
| Learning Curve | Requires more time to master due to its complexity. | ✓Easier to learn, especially for developers familiar with React hooks. |
| Team Experience | Better suited for teams familiar with reactive programming patterns. | ✓Ideal for teams preferring simpler API design and hooks-based state management. |
| Weekly Downloads | Consistently downloads at 2.8M per week. | ✓Far exceeds with 21.6M downloads weekly. |
| Overall Popularity | Widely regarded with 28.2K stars on GitHub. | ✓Significantly higher with 56.9K stars, indicating strong community support. |
| Community Engagement | A mature ecosystem but with a slower engagement rate. | ✓Active community and fast growth in user base. |
| State Management Complexity | ✓Offers robust solutions for complex state needs. | Simplicity is key, making it ideal for straightforward state management. |