xstate vs zustand
Side-by-side comparison of xstate and zustand
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.4M
- Stars
- 29.2K
- Gzip Size
- 14.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 169
- Forks
- 1.3K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 56.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 4
- Forks
- 1.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 95.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
xstate is designed for applications requiring complex state management using finite state machines and statecharts, making it well-suited for systems that need detailed workflows and orchestration. In contrast, zustand focuses on simplicity and minimalism for state management specifically in React applications, providing an easy-to-use solution without the overhead of more complex state management libraries.
For projects with intricate state transitions and multi-faceted workflows, xstate may be the preferred choice, especially for teams experienced in state machines. On the other hand, zustand is an excellent option for smaller to medium-sized React applications where speed of development and ease of use take priority, particularly for developers familiar with hooks.
While both libraries are efficient in their own right, developers considering migration should be aware of the differing paradigms: xstate relies on statecharts and transitions, which can introduce complexity, whereas zustand's direct state management could simplify workflows but may lack the robust features of xstate for handling complicated scenarios.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | xstate | zustand |
|---|---|---|
| Version | Stable version with ongoing updates. | Recent version, actively maintained. |
| Description | Ideal for complex state management with workflows. | Focused on straightforward state management in React. |
| Open Issues | 169 open issues may indicate complexities. | ✓Only 3 open issues suggest better maintenance. |
| GitHub Forks | 1.3K forks show interest for contributions. | ✓1.9K forks imply greater developer engagement. |
| GitHub Stars | High star count suggests solid popularity. | ✓More stars, indicating strong community backing. |
| Last Updated | Last updated recently, ensuring features are current. | ✓Updated slightly more recently with active development. |
| Use Case Fit | Best for complex state-driven applications. | Ideal for React apps needing simple state management. |
| Unpacked Size | 2.2 MB size, suitable for larger applications. | ✓95 kB indicates a lightweight solution. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper learning curve due to state machines. | ✓Simpler, straightforward API with easy adoption. |
| Weekly Downloads | 3.4M downloads indicate strong adoption. | ✓21.6M downloads reflect high usage and community support. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 14.4 kB, larger footprint for features. | ✓3.5 kB, very lightweight and performant. |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Strong TypeScript support, catering to modern devs. | Good TypeScript support, but not as extensive. |