mobx vs recoil
Side-by-side comparison of mobx and recoil
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 28.2K
- Gzip Size
- 18.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 83
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 470.5K
- Stars
- 19.5K
- Gzip Size
- 29.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 323
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 3
Download Trends
Verdict
mobx offers a straightforward approach to state management that excels in projects requiring scalability and a reactive programming model. It is particularly suitable for larger applications where state consistency and performance are critical, making it favorable for teams with experience in both JavaScript and TypeScript.
In contrast, recoil provides a more React-centric solution that simplifies global state management for this specific ecosystem. It may be a better fit for smaller applications or teams looking for a library that integrates smoothly with React’s hooks system, despite its lesser adoption reflected in download and star metrics.
When considering migration, it is important to note mobx's larger bundle size compared to recoil's, potentially leading to performance implications for web applications focused on initial load times. Additionally, recoil's higher number of open issues may indicate ongoing development challenges, which could impact long-term maintenance lifecycles.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | mobx | recoil |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT, promoting wide usage and contributions. | MIT, equally permissive. |
| Version | ✓Latest release is 6.15.0, indicating active development. | 0.7.7 suggests it is still in early stages. |
| Description | ✓Simple, scalable state management focused on extensive use cases. | Specific to React, aiming to simplify state management. |
| Open Issues | ✓83 open issues could imply active maintenance efforts. | 323 open issues may signal challenges in development. |
| Performance | ✓Designed for large-scale applications with efficient state management. | Focused on React with potentially less complexity, but might lack optimization for larger projects. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓1.8K forks suggest a robust ecosystem for development. | 1.2K forks indicate a smaller community of contributors. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓28.2K stars reflect popularity and support. | 19.5K stars show notable but less engagement. |
| Last Updated | ✓Last updated on 2026-01-04, showing recent activity. | Last updated on 2025-01-01 suggests less immediate focus. |
| Unpacked Size | 4.3 MB may be considerable for some projects. | ✓2.2 MB makes it lightweight and ideal for smaller apps. |
| Learning Curve | May require deeper understanding due to its extensive features. | ✓Simplified API caters well to React developers, promoting easier adoption. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓2.8M downloads demonstrate strong community engagement. | 471.1K indicates a smaller user base. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 18.5 kB, suitable for web applications. | 29.5 kB indicates a heavier footprint. |