mobx vs redux
Side-by-side comparison of mobx and redux
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 28.2K
- Gzip Size
- 18.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1mo ago
- Open Issues
- 83
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 61.5K
- Gzip Size
- 1.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 44
- Forks
- 15.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 289.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
mobx excels in scenarios requiring simple and scalable state management, particularly for applications that benefit from reactive programming. It serves developers looking for tight integration with React and TypeScript, providing a more declarative approach to state management.
redux, on the other hand, is suited for larger applications that require predictable state operations and a more structured workflow. Its vast community support and extensive middleware ecosystem make it ideal for complex state logic, especially for teams familiar with functional programming and flux architecture.
Developers considering migration from one to the other should evaluate their application complexity and team expertise. While transitioning to redux may require a steeper learning curve, those focused on simplicity might find mobx easier to implement initially.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | mobx | redux |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | 83 open issues indicate some ongoing challenges that may affect support. | ✓43 open issues suggest more stable maintenance and quicker resolutions. |
| GitHub Stars | 28.2K stars demonstrate significant interest and support. | ✓61.4K stars reflect a larger community and more extensive resources. |
| Last Updated | Updated on 2026-01-04, showing active maintenance. | ✓Last updated on 2026-02-04, indicating even more recent activity. |
| Unpacked Size | 4.3 MB is moderate; it may be important for performance-sensitive applications. | ✓289.8 kB is relatively small and contributes to faster load times. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Lower learning curve makes mobx accessible for quick integration. | Higher learning curve due to redux's boilerplate and architecture. |
| Overall Use Case | Best for simple, reactive state management in React apps. | ✓Best for complex applications requiring predictable state transitions. |
| Weekly Downloads | 2.8M downloads suggest stable usage among a dedicated user base. | ✓21.6M downloads indicate wider adoption in the developer community. |
| Community Support | Strong community but less extensive than redux. | ✓Wider community with abundant middleware and resources. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 18.5 kB is substantial, potentially impacting initial load performance. | ✓1.4 kB is minimal, contributing to better performance. |
| TypeScript Support | Good TypeScript support is integrated for better development experience. | Strong TypeScript support along with community-driven types. |
| Documentation Quality | Well-documented but less comprehensive than redux's offerings. | ✓Extensive documentation facilitating a better onboarding experience. |