notistack vs react-hot-toast
Side-by-side comparison of notistack and react-hot-toast
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.3M
- Stars
- 4.1K
- Gzip Size
- 13.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 66
- Forks
- 296
- Unpacked Size
- 459.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 5
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.8M
- Stars
- 10.8K
- Gzip Size
- 8.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 5mo ago
- Open Issues
- 134
- Forks
- 366
- Unpacked Size
- 202.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 3
Download Trends
Verdict
notistack is well-suited for developers looking for a highly customizable notification solution integrated with Material-UI. Its ability to stack notifications makes it ideal for applications requiring complex user interfaces and a robust design. Conversely, react-hot-toast serves those who prefer a lightweight, aesthetically pleasing solution that works out of the box, suitable for simpler notifications without heavy customization.
For smaller projects or teams with less experience in UI design, react-hot-toast may be the better option due to its simplicity and beautiful default styling. If your project involves Material-UI or requires extensive customization, notistack is recommended for its rich feature set and adaptability. The decision may also hinge on the existing ecosystem in which the application operates, particularly regarding dependency management and design consistency.
When transitioning between these two, consider the differences in unpacked sizes and their impact on loading performance. While notistack offers greater flexibility, it comes with a larger footprint, which could affect smaller applications. On the other hand, react-hot-toast provides a more streamlined approach, but you may sacrifice some customizability in exchange for ease of use.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | notistack | react-hot-toast |
|---|---|---|
| Open Issues | ✓66 open issues, indicating active maintenance with some areas needing attention. | 134 open issues, potentially pointing to more challenges needing resolution. |
| GitHub Forks | 296 forks, indicating moderate community engagement. | ✓367 forks, suggesting slightly more community-driven variations and contributions. |
| GitHub Stars | 4.1K stars, showing decent community interest and support. | ✓10.8K stars, reflecting a stronger community following and developer trust. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2025-01-18, current as of the last release. | ✓Updated on 2025-08-16, indicating more recent maintenance and feature addition. |
| Unpacked Size | Larger at 459.3 kB, which may impact performance in smaller applications. | ✓More compact at 202.7 kB, beneficial for performance-oriented projects. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper due to extensive features and Material-UI integration. | ✓Gentle learning curve, ideal for those new to notifications. |
| Overall Purpose | Great for customizable notification stacks in Material-UI applications. | Ideal for lightweight, attractive notifications requiring minimal setup. |
| Weekly Downloads | 1.3 million, indicating solid usage mostly in established projects. | ✓Higher at 2.8 million, suggesting broad appeal and adoption. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Larger at 13.0 kB, making it less efficient for small apps. | ✓Smaller at 8.0 kB, better suited for quick-loading applications. |
| Customization Flexibility | ✓Highly customizable with support for complex use cases. | Less customizable but offers stylings that look good by default. |
| Integration with UI Libraries | ✓Best integrated with Material-UI, enhancing consistency in designs. | Can be used with any UI library but not specifically optimized for one. |