PACKAGE · MARKDOWN

shiki

A beautiful Syntax Highlighter.

WEEKLY DOWNLOADS 15.2M
STARS 13.7K
FORKS 596
OPEN ISSUES 108
GZIP SIZE 64.7 kB
UNPACKED SIZE 602.9 kB
DEPENDENCIES 8
LAST UPDATED 5mo ago
DOWNLOAD TRENDS

shiki downloads — last 12 months

Download trends for shiki1 download series from Aug 2025 to Jul 2026. Use left and right arrow keys to inspect monthly values.018.6M37.3M55.9M74.6MAug 2025NovFebMayJul 2026
shiki
ABOUT SHIKI

Shiki is a syntax highlighter designed to bring beautiful code formatting to web applications. It addresses the challenge of presenting code snippets clearly and accurately to users, solving the problem of raw, unformatted code cluttering documentation or application interfaces.

Its core philosophy centers on leveraging TextMate grammars, the same standard used by popular code editors like VS Code. This allows Shiki to offer a familiar and robust parsing experience, targeting developers who need high-fidelity code rendering in their projects. The design prioritizes accuracy and ease of integration for those familiar with editor-based syntax highlighting.

Shiki's architecture revolves around its `highlighter` instance, which is created using `getHighlighter` and configured with themes and languages. This instance provides methods like `codeToHtml` and `codeToThemedTokens`, enabling programmatic conversion of code strings into styled HTML or tokenized structures. This API pattern allows for granular control over the output.

The package is highly versatile and integrates seamlessly into various frontend frameworks and static site generators. Its output can be directly embedded in HTML, making it suitable for frameworks like React, Vue, Svelte, or even plain HTML files. It's often used within Markdown processors that are configured to use Shiki for code block rendering.

With a substantial weekly download count of 15.0M and strong community backing evidenced by 13.6K GitHub stars, Shiki demonstrates significant maturity and adoption. Its reported gzip bundle size of 64.7 kB makes it a relatively efficient choice for frontend applications where performance and bundle size are considerations.

However, developers should be aware of the potential trade-offs. While Shiki supports a wide array of languages and themes, loading numerous grammars and themes can increase the initial load time and bundle size. For extremely minimal environments or projects with very few code blocks and limited language requirements, a more lightweight, custom solution might be considered.

WHEN TO USE
  • When rendering code blocks in Markdown-based documentation sites that require accurate syntax highlighting.
  • When integrating syntax highlighting into a static site generator where Shiki's `codeToHtml` output can be pre-rendered.
  • When building a custom editor or viewer that needs to parse and display code with TextMate grammar compatibility.
  • When you need to support a wide range of programming languages and themes within your application.
  • When integrating with JAMstack architectures that benefit from server-side rendering or pre-built assets for code presentation.
  • When leveraging `codeToThemedTokens` to enable client-side highlighting or custom styling based on Shiki's tokenization.
WHEN NOT TO USE
  • If your application only requires highlighting for a single, very simple language and minimal styling, a lightweight, custom solution might suffice.
  • If you are building a terminal application where standard ANSI escape codes are the preferred method for coloring output.
  • When aiming for the absolute smallest possible JavaScript bundle size and only need to highlight very few, basic code snippets.
  • If your project exclusively uses a Markdown parser that already has a well-integrated, performant syntax highlighting engine you cannot replace.
  • When focusing on an environment where JavaScript execution is severely limited or completely unavailable and static, pre-highlighted HTML is not feasible.

CORRECTIONS

Spot wrong data here?

A short note helps us fix it.

Anonymous · No account · No email back

COMPARISONS 5
shiki vs mdast-util-mdx-jsx ★ 32 · 29.6M/wk shiki vs marked ★ 37.0K · 52.1M/wk shiki vs @mdx-js/react ★ 19.7K · 16.0M/wk shiki vs remark ★ 8.7K · 4.3M/wk shiki vs rehype ★ 2.2K · 3.3M/wk