remark vs shiki
Side-by-side comparison of remark and shiki
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.0M
- Stars
- 8.7K
- Gzip Size
- 38.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3d ago
- Open Issues
- 5
- Forks
- 374
- Unpacked Size
- 15.7 kB
- Dependencies
- 42
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.7M
- Stars
- 12.9K
- Gzip Size
- 1.7 MB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 89
- Forks
- 571
- Unpacked Size
- 597.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 24
Download Trends
Verdict
Remark serves as a powerful markdown processor that leverages a plugin-centric architecture, making it suitable for developers looking to integrate markdown processing in various applications. It is particularly effective for projects that require a high degree of customization and extensibility related to markdown content.
On the other hand, Shiki is a dedicated syntax highlighter that excels in delivering visually appealing code presentations. It is best for projects where syntax highlighting is a primary concern, especially if the visual aspect is essential for the overall user experience.
Given Remark's smaller size and robust plugin ecosystem, it may be more suitable for lightweight applications or those with existing markdown needs. Conversely, choose Shiki for applications where enhanced syntax highlighting is a core requirement, understanding the trade-off of a larger bundle size and more open issues to manage.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | remark | shiki |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT License, fostering wide usability. | Also MIT License, ensuring similar access. |
| Version | Latest version is 15.0.1. | ✓Latest version is 3.22.0. |
| Description | Powerful markdown processor utilizing plugins for customization. | Focuses on beautiful and aesthetic syntax highlighting. |
| Open Issues | ✓Only 5 open issues, suggesting good maintenance. | 86 open issues may indicate a larger user feedback surface. |
| GitHub Forks | 374 forks, indicating usage in various projects. | ✓571 forks, reflecting broader experimentation. |
| GitHub Stars | 8.7K stars showcasing a solid user base. | ✓12.9K stars, suggesting higher community interest. |
| Primary Usage | Designed for processing and transforming markdown content. | Primarily used for syntax highlighting of code snippets. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 15.7 kB, ideal for minimal impact. | Larger at 597.3 kB, which could affect load times. |
| Visual Appeal | Primarily focuses on text processing, not visuals. | ✓Prioritizes aesthetic syntax highlighting for enhanced readability. |
| Weekly Downloads | 3.0M downloads reflecting steady usage. | ✓5.7M downloads indicating higher demand. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Efficient at 38.5 kB gzip, suitable for fast applications. | Much larger at 1.7 MB gzip, which may slow down initial loads. |
| Customization and Extensibility | ✓Highly customizable with a rich plugin ecosystem. | Limited customization options focused on highlighting features. |