rehype vs shiki
Side-by-side comparison of rehype and shiki
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.6M
- Stars
- 2.2K
- Gzip Size
- 70.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 11mo ago
- Open Issues
- 2
- Forks
- 92
- Unpacked Size
- 13.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 31
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.7M
- Stars
- 12.9K
- Gzip Size
- 1.7 MB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1d ago
- Open Issues
- 89
- Forks
- 571
- Unpacked Size
- 597.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 24
Download Trends
Verdict
rehype is an effective HTML processor that utilizes a plugin architecture to assist users in transforming HTML content, making it suitable for developers looking to manipulate and optimize HTML easily. Conversely, shiki is geared towards providing rich syntax highlighting for various programming languages, focusing on visual presentation and ease of use for developers needing to display code elegantly.
When choosing between rehype and shiki, consider your project's specific needs. If your primary goal is to process and structure HTML, rehype is the better choice due to its focused functionality within that domain. However, if your project demands high-quality syntax highlighting for code snippets or technical documentation, shiki would serve that purpose more effectively with its dedicated features.
Migration from one to the other is straightforward in terms of setup given their MIT licenses, but project scope can dictate challenges. If you initially plan to implement rehype for HTML manipulation but later need syntax highlighting, you might find yourself needing to adopt shiki or a similar package, indicating a need for clear project requirements from the start.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | rehype | shiki |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT license offers permissive use and contributions. | Also under MIT license, providing similar flexibility. |
| Categories | Classified under Markdown, indicating its utility in text formatting. | Also under Markdown, confirming similar use cases. |
| Open Issues | ✓2 open issues suggest good maintenance and low user-reported problems. | 86 open issues may indicate ongoing challenges or feature requests. |
| GitHub Forks | 92 forks suggest limited community experimentation. | ✓571 forks indicate extensive development and customization. |
| GitHub Stars | 2.2K stars reflect a respectable, though lower, level of interest. | ✓12.9K stars highlight strong community support and interest. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2025-02-28 indicates recent active development. | ✓Updated on 2026-02-06, showing that it is actively maintained. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Compact at 13.3 kB, making it lightweight for integration. | Significantly larger at 597.3 kB, which could impact performance. |
| Topics Covered | Focused on HTML and AST manipulation, indicating specialized knowledge. | ✓Broad topics including syntax highlighting convey versatility. |
| Overall Use Case | Optimal for processing and optimizing HTML content. | Designed specifically for beautiful syntax highlighting. |
| Weekly Downloads | 1.6M weekly downloads indicates moderate traction. | ✓5.7M weekly downloads show higher popularity among users. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Gzipped size of 70.0 kB is efficient for web usage. | 1.7 MB gzipped size may lead to slower load times in web environments. |