@sinclair/typebox vs yup
Side-by-side comparison of @sinclair/typebox and yup
- Weekly Downloads
- 84.2M
- Stars
- 0
- Gzip Size
- 14.2 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Unpacked Size
- 1.9 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 9.4M
- Stars
- 23.7K
- Gzip Size
- 14.2 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 33m ago
- Open Issues
- 239
- Forks
- 940
- Unpacked Size
- 270.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
@sinclair/typebox excels in creating JSON schemas with a strong focus on TypeScript static type resolution, making it particularly appealing for TypeScript-heavy projects where type safety and validation are critical. It serves developers who need to generate schemas dynamically while ensuring type compatibility throughout their application.
On the other hand, yup is designed for straightforward object schema validation, making it user-friendly and suitable for projects of varying sizes. It integrates well into applications requiring simple validation rules and is a solid choice for teams that prioritize minimal configuration and ease of use.
If your project heavily leverages TypeScript and requires rigorous type-checking alongside schema validation, @sinclair/typebox would be the go-to option. Conversely, for simpler projects with less focus on TypeScript, yup provides an efficient solution without the overhead of more complex configurations.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | @sinclair/typebox | yup |
|---|---|---|
| Topics | ✓legacy, support, typebox | N/A |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Version | 0.34.48 | ✓1.7.1 |
| Categories | Validation | Validation |
| Description | Json Schema Type Builder with Static Type Resolution for TypeScript | ✓Dead simple Object schema validation |
| Open Issues | ✓0 | 239 |
| GitHub Forks | 0 | ✓940 |
| GitHub Stars | 0 | ✓23.7K |
| Last Updated | 2026-02-04 | ✓2026-02-07 |
| Unpacked Size | 1.9 MB | ✓270.4 kB |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓83.7M | 9.4M |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 14.2 kB | 14.2 kB |