joi vs yup
Side-by-side comparison of joi and yup
- Weekly Downloads
- 16.4M
- Stars
- 21.2K
- Gzip Size
- 60.2 kB
- License
- BSD-3-Clause
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 186
- Forks
- 1.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 557.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 7
- Weekly Downloads
- 9.4M
- Stars
- 23.7K
- Gzip Size
- 14.2 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 33m ago
- Open Issues
- 239
- Forks
- 940
- Unpacked Size
- 270.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
joi excels in handling complex schemas and provides a versatile validation framework suitable for larger applications and teams with extensive experience in schema validation. Its robust feature set and strong community make it a solid choice for projects requiring detailed validation rules and object structures.
On the other hand, yup offers a more simplistic and intuitive approach, ideal for smaller projects or developers new to validation libraries. Its lightweight nature and straightforward API can facilitate quicker implementations, making it an attractive option for those who prioritize ease of use over extensive functionality.
When considering migration, developers already using joi might find that transitioning to yup could involve adjustments in how schemas are structured. Additionally, given joi's larger size and feature set, teams might need to evaluate their specific needs to decide if the streamlined approach of yup truly meets their requirements.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | joi | yup |
|---|---|---|
| License | Uses BSD-3-Clause, which is permissive. | MIT license, widely recognized and permissive. |
| Version | Latest update as of November 2025. | ✓Recent version updated in February 2026. |
| Description | Comprehensive object schema validation tool. | Simple, user-friendly object schema validation. |
| Open Issues | ✓186 open issues may suggest ongoing improvements. | 239 open issues could indicate challenges in its development. |
| GitHub Forks | ✓1.5K forks allow for greater community contributions. | 940 forks indicate a smaller but active developer interest. |
| GitHub Stars | 21.2K stars indicates solid community interest. | ✓23.7K stars suggesting a very engaged user base. |
| Unpacked Size | 557.3 kB, larger indicating more features. | ✓270.4 kB, lighter for quicker installations. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper learning curve due to complexity. | ✓Gentle learning curve, easy for beginners. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓Significant user base with 16.4M downloads. | Lower at 9.4M weekly downloads, but still strong. |
| Community Support | ✓Robust community with strong contributions. | Good support but less extensive than joi's. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | 60.2 kB, moderately sized for a library. | ✓14.2 kB, contributing to faster load times. |