valibot vs yup
Side-by-side comparison of valibot and yup
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.8M
- Stars
- 8.4K
- Gzip Size
- 13.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3d ago
- Open Issues
- 136
- Forks
- 304
- Unpacked Size
- 1.7 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 9.4M
- Stars
- 23.7K
- Gzip Size
- 14.2 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 33m ago
- Open Issues
- 239
- Forks
- 940
- Unpacked Size
- 270.4 kB
- Dependencies
- 4
Download Trends
Verdict
valibot excels in providing a modular and type-safe schema validation system, suitable for developers seeking a highly structured approach to data validation with TypeScript in mind. Its focus on runtime validation allows for flexible schema definitions that can adapt to various data structures.
In contrast, yup offers a straightforward and easy-to-use syntax for object schema validation, making it an attractive option for teams looking for quick and simple validation solutions. The higher weekly download numbers indicate a broader user base which could lead to stronger community support and more resources for learning and troubleshooting.
While both options support TypeScript, valibot's smaller bundle size and modularity can be beneficial for performance-sensitive applications, making it better suited for larger projects. On the flip side, developers familiar with rapid development cycles may prefer yup for its simplicity and established user base.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | valibot | yup |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT, offering flexibility for various uses | Also MIT, providing the same legal assurances |
| Modularity | ✓Highly modular, suitable for complex applications | Less modular, more suited for simpler use cases |
| Open Issues | 136 open issues could indicate areas needing attention | ✓239 open issues reflect an even larger scope of improvements and features desired |
| GitHub Forks | 304 forks hint at some community experimentation | ✓940 forks suggest more widespread development iteration |
| GitHub Stars | 8.4K stars showcase a decent level of interest | ✓23.7K stars reflect a much larger community following |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2026-02-05 | ✓More recently updated on 2026-02-07 |
| Unpacked Size | ✓1.7 MB, relatively small for a schema library | 270.4 kB, which is larger but still manageable |
| Learning Curve | May require some initial investment to harness its modular features | ✓Designed for ease of use with straightforward validation schema |
| Weekly Downloads | 5.8M downloads indicating solid usage | ✓Higher at 9.4M downloads, suggesting greater popularity |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 13.4 kB, which is efficient for usage | Slightly larger at 14.2 kB but still reasonable |
| TypeScript Support | ✓Designed with type safety in mind | Has TypeScript support but not as comprehensive |