superstruct vs valibot
Side-by-side comparison of superstruct and valibot
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.7M
- Stars
- 7.2K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 98
- Forks
- 221
- Unpacked Size
- 182.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.8M
- Stars
- 8.4K
- Gzip Size
- 13.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 3d ago
- Open Issues
- 136
- Forks
- 304
- Unpacked Size
- 1.7 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
superstruct is geared towards providing a straightforward validation approach for developers focused on data integrity in JavaScript and TypeScript. It serves well in projects needing lightweight validation with a low entry barrier, making it a solid choice for smaller teams or simpler use cases.
valibot, on the other hand, excels in offering a more modular and type-safe experience, ideal for larger applications requiring extensive schema validation. Its emphasis on modularity makes it suitable for teams with experience in complex validation scenarios or who anticipate significant expansions in their data structures.
When considering migration, developers may find superstruct's smaller bundle size appealing for quicker load times. However, valibot's larger unpacked size indicates richer features that could be beneficial for intricate projects, albeit at the cost of increased complexity and maintenance overhead.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | superstruct | valibot |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | ✓Easier to learn and implement, suitable for novice developers. | Involves a steeper learning curve, suitable for experienced teams. |
| Open Issues | ✓98 open issues, which may signal some ongoing concerns. | 136 open issues, illustrating higher complexity or ongoing development challenges. |
| GitHub Forks | 221 forks, suggesting some interest in customization. | ✓304 forks, indicating more experimentation by developers. |
| GitHub Stars | 7.2K stars, reflecting a decent following. | ✓8.4K stars, showing a stronger community backing. |
| Last Updated | Recently updated on 2024-10-01, showing active maintenance. | ✓Last updated in 2026-02-05, suggesting recent activity or new feature additions. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓182.3 kB, a lightweight option for smaller projects. | 1.7 MB, larger and potentially more feature-rich. |
| Modular Design | Less emphasis on modularity, which may simplify usage. | ✓Highly modular, allowing tailored validation strategies. |
| Weekly Downloads | 3.7 million, indicating solid community usage. | ✓5.8 million, suggesting broader adoption and support. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal at 3.5 kB, beneficial for performance. | Heavier at 13.4 kB, which may impact load times. |
| TypeScript Support | Good TypeScript support, making it accessible for typed projects. | ✓Strong type-safe features, catering to TypeScript-heavy applications. |
| Use Case Flexibility | Best for straightforward validation needs. | ✓Ideal for complex and scalable validation scenarios. |