superstruct vs zod
Side-by-side comparison of superstruct and zod
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.7M
- Stars
- 7.2K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 98
- Forks
- 221
- Unpacked Size
- 182.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 92.2M
- Stars
- 41.8K
- Gzip Size
- 63.7 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 2h ago
- Open Issues
- 228
- Forks
- 1.8K
- Unpacked Size
- 4.3 MB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
superstruct is designed for simplicity and composability in data validation, catering primarily to developers who need a lightweight solution. Its small size and straightforward API make it suitable for smaller projects or teams with less experience in schema validation. On the other hand, zod focuses on TypeScript and provides a more robust, type-safe schema declaration process, which is advantageous for larger projects where type inference is critical.
When deciding between superstruct and zod, consider team expertise and project requirements. If you are working on a lightweight application or if your team prefers minimal setup, superstruct may be the right choice. Conversely, if your project heavily relies on TypeScript and requires extensive validation, zod's advanced features and support for static type inference could be more beneficial.
Migration from superstruct to zod could involve adjustments to embrace the latter's emphasis on TypeScript-first design. Developers may also need to manage the steeper learning curve that comes with zod's advanced type capabilities, unlike the more intuitive approach offered by superstruct.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | superstruct | zod |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Minimal at 3.5 kB gzip, ensuring low overhead. | More substantial at 63.7 kB gzip, which could impact browser performance. |
| Open Issues | ✓98 open issues, reflecting manageable maintenance and user support. | 246 open issues may signify more ongoing challenges. |
| GitHub Forks | 221 forks, suggesting moderate developer engagement in customization. | ✓1.8K forks represent a higher level of community involvement. |
| GitHub Stars | 7.2K stars, indicating a decent level of popularity and community support. | ✓41.8K stars, showcasing strong interest and endorsement from developers. |
| Last Updated | ✓Last updated in October 2024, showing relatively recent activity. | Last updated in February 2026, indicating a longer period without significant updates. |
| Unpacked Size | ✓Lightweight at 182.3 kB, making it easy to incorporate into projects. | Larger at 4.3 MB, potentially affecting load performance in smaller applications. |
| Learning Curve | ✓Easy to learn with a straightforward API, ideal for beginners. | More complex due to its advanced features, requiring more familiarity with TypeScript. |
| Weekly Downloads | Consistent but modest weekly downloads at 3.7M. | ✓Significantly higher weekly downloads at 92.4M, indicating broader usage. |
| TypeScript Support | Offers basic TypeScript compatibility. | ✓Designed specifically with TypeScript in mind, providing enhanced type safety. |
| Overall Positioning | Best for simplicity and composable validation in lighter applications. | ✓Focused on TypeScript-first validation with robust type inference capabilities. |
| Practical Recommendation | Best suited for smaller projects or teams needing simple validation. | ✓Recommended for larger applications with extensive TypeScript use and validation needs. |