joi vs superstruct
Side-by-side comparison of joi and superstruct
- Weekly Downloads
- 16.4M
- Stars
- 21.2K
- Gzip Size
- 60.2 kB
- License
- BSD-3-Clause
- Last Updated
- 2mo ago
- Open Issues
- 186
- Forks
- 1.5K
- Unpacked Size
- 557.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 7
- Weekly Downloads
- 3.7M
- Stars
- 7.2K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 98
- Forks
- 221
- Unpacked Size
- 182.3 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
joi excels in its ability to provide comprehensive object schema validation, making it an ideal choice for projects that require detailed data validation and complex schemas. Its large download numbers and GitHub community indicate a strong presence in the ecosystem, which can be beneficial for developers seeking ample resources and community support.
On the other hand, superstruct offers a simpler approach to data validation with a focus on composability and ease of use, which may appeal to smaller projects or teams with limited experience in JavaScript or TypeScript validation. If your project is lightweight and you prioritize simplicity, superstruct may be the appropriate choice, given its significantly smaller bundle size and simple API.
When considering migration from one to the other, it’s worth noting that while joi provides extensive validation features, it may introduce some complexity. In contrast, superstruct's lighter footprint and direct approach could lead to faster development cycles and easier onboarding, especially for less experienced developers.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | joi | superstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Flexibility | ✓Highly flexible and customizable validation capabilities. | Less flexible but straightforward, offering composable validation structures. |
| Open Issues | 186 open issues may suggest some complexity and active development needs. | ✓98 open issues show a leaner development challenge. |
| GitHub Stars | ✓Robust community support with 21.2K stars shows significant appreciation from developers. | 7.2K stars represent a healthy but smaller level of visibility and recognition. |
| Last Updated | ✓Recently updated in November 2025, indicating ongoing maintenance. | Last updated in October 2024, suggesting a slightly longer interval since recent changes. |
| Unpacked Size | Larger unpacked size at 557.3 kB, providing more features. | ✓Much smaller unpacked size at 182.3 kB, allowing for lightweight implementations. |
| Learning Curve | Steeper learning curve due to extensive feature set and complexity. | ✓Lower learning curve, easy to grasp for newcomers to validation. |
| Weekly Downloads | ✓High popularity with 16.4 million downloads indicates strong community adoption. | Moderate popularity at 3.7 million downloads suggests a smaller but dedicated user base. |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | Relatively larger at 60.2 kB, potentially affecting load times. | ✓Minimal at 3.5 kB, beneficial for performance-sensitive applications. |
| Community Activity | ✓Large number of forks (1.5K) indicates active community contributions. | Fewer forks (221) may reflect less community engagement. |
| TypeScript Support | Well-established TypeScript support, ideal for projects utilizing TypeScript. | Offers strong TypeScript compatibility, making it accessible for modern JavaScript developers. |
| Overall Positioning | ✓Extensive and complex schema validation suitable for larger projects. | Simple data validation well-suited for smaller projects or those needing quick integration. |