bootstrap vs tailwindcss
Side-by-side comparison of bootstrap and tailwindcss
- Weekly Downloads
- 5.4M
- Stars
- 174.0K
- Gzip Size
- 24.9 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 13h ago
- Open Issues
- 571
- Forks
- 79.1K
- Unpacked Size
- 9.6 MB
- Dependencies
- 2
- Weekly Downloads
- 53.4M
- Stars
- 93.4K
- Gzip Size
- 69.0 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 20h ago
- Open Issues
- 75
- Forks
- 5.0K
- Unpacked Size
- 748.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
Download Trends
Verdict
Bootstrap is a comprehensive front-end framework well-suited for developers looking to create responsive, mobile-first designs with a conventional structure. Its extensive pre-designed components make it particularly beneficial for teams needing quick prototyping or consistent UI patterns.
In contrast, Tailwind CSS offers a utility-first approach that empowers developers to build custom user interfaces rapidly. It is especially advantageous for larger projects where design flexibility and custom styling are prioritized, making it an excellent choice for experienced developers or teams familiar with CSS methodologies.
While Bootstrap provides a more guided approach with its components, Tailwind CSS may present a steeper learning curve for those not familiar with utility-first concepts. Developers contemplating between the two should assess their project requirements and team's familiarity with the frameworks' philosophies.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | bootstrap | tailwindcss |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | ✓Minimal at 24.9 kB (gzip), ensuring faster load times | Larger at 69.0 kB (gzip), which could impact performance |
| Flexibility | More rigid with predefined components, limiting customization | ✓Highly flexible allowing for unique design implementations |
| Open Issues | 572 open issues may indicate ongoing concerns or areas for improvement | ✓76 issues suggest better maintenance or lower complexity |
| GitHub Stars | ✓174.0K stars reflect high community appreciation | 93.4K stars indicate strong but lesser interest compared to Bootstrap |
| Unpacked Size | 9.6 MB indicates a comprehensive solution with many resources | ✓748.8 kB suggests a more lightweight framework |
| Learning Curve | ✓More straightforward for beginners due to its component-based structure | Utility-first design may require more initial investment in understanding |
| Team Experience | ✓Ideal for teams needing rapid development with less design expertise | Best suited for experienced developers who prefer custom solutions |
| Weekly Downloads | 5.4M downloads indicate solid usage but less than its competitor | ✓52.8M downloads suggest high popularity and adoption |