redux vs zustand
Side-by-side comparison of redux and zustand
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 61.5K
- Gzip Size
- 1.4 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 44
- Forks
- 15.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 289.8 kB
- Dependencies
- 1
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 56.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 4
- Forks
- 1.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 95.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
redux excels in larger applications where predictable state management is essential, making it a strong choice for teams that require a structured approach to state. With a robust ecosystem and significant community support evident from its high GitHub stars and downloads, redux serves projects that prioritize scalability and maintainability.
On the other hand, zustand is suitable for smaller to medium-sized React applications where simplicity and speed are prioritized. Given its minimalistic API and lower overhead, zustand is a practical choice for developers seeking to manage state efficiently within React without the boilerplate typically associated with redux.
While both libraries are built for state management, teams transitioning from redux to zustand may need to re-evaluate their state structure and component interactions due to the differences in API design and usage patterns. Ultimately, the choice between redux and zustand should align with the team's familiarity and the specific needs of the project.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | redux | zustand |
|---|---|---|
| License | MIT License allows for flexible usage | MIT License common for open source ensures wide compatibility |
| Open Issues | Managed issues with only 43 open, indicating a healthy maintenance pace | ✓Fewer issues at 3 open, suggesting smooth ongoing development |
| GitHub Forks | ✓Active development possible with 15.2K forks | Fewer forks at 1.9K, suggesting lesser experimental usage |
| GitHub Stars | ✓High visibility with 61.4K stars, reflecting community trust | Solid 56.9K stars, but less than redux |
| Last Updated | Recent update, indicating ongoing support and feature evolution | Only slightly more recent, showing regular maintenance |
| Unpacked Size | Larger at 289.8 kB, which may impact loading time | ✓Smaller at 95.0 kB, beneficial for quicker load times |
| Learning Curve | Steeper learning curve due to its complex API and features | ✓Easier to learn and implement, especially for new projects |
| Weekly Downloads | Consistent 21.6M downloads, indicating broad usage | Equal to redux with 21.6M downloads |
| Bundle Size (gzip) | ✓Minimal gzip size of 1.4 kB, advantageous for final production bundles | Larger gzip size at 3.5 kB, potentially larger impact on load times |
| Overall Popularity | ✓Widely adopted with significant community engagement evident in stars and forks | Good adoption but less community engagement than redux |
| Project Suitability | Ideal for large-scale applications requiring robust state management | ✓Best for small to medium applications where simplicity is favored |