recoil vs zustand
Side-by-side comparison of recoil and zustand
- Weekly Downloads
- 470.5K
- Stars
- 19.5K
- Gzip Size
- 29.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 1y ago
- Open Issues
- 323
- Forks
- 1.2K
- Unpacked Size
- 2.2 MB
- Dependencies
- 3
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.6M
- Stars
- 56.9K
- Gzip Size
- 3.5 kB
- License
- MIT
- Last Updated
- 4d ago
- Open Issues
- 4
- Forks
- 1.9K
- Unpacked Size
- 95.0 kB
- Dependencies
- 2
Download Trends
Verdict
Recoil excels in managing complex state dependencies within React applications, making it ideal for projects that require fine-grained reactivity and a context-aware approach to state management. Its integration with React is seamless, but it may come with a steeper learning curve for teams not familiar with similar paradigms.
Zustand, in contrast, is designed for simplicity and performance with a lighter footprint, catering well to smaller scale projects or teams looking for quick state management solutions without the overhead of a more complex system. Its minimalistic API makes it easy to adopt, especially for teams seeking to maintain high performance with lower resource consumption.
When deciding between the two, consider zustand for straightforward state management needs or smaller projects, while recoil is better suited for larger applications requiring more sophisticated state handling. Migrating from one to the other will depend on the complexity of state interactions within the application, as recoil's structure is more nuanced compared to zustand's simplicity.
Detailed Comparison
| Criteria | recoil | zustand |
|---|---|---|
| Bundle Size | Larger at 29.5 kB gzipped, impacting load times in smaller apps. | ✓Minimal at 3.5 kB gzip, making it very lightweight. |
| Ease of Use | More complex API; steeper learning curve. | ✓Very straightforward API; easy for beginners. |
| Open Issues | 323 open issues may suggest challenges in scalability or usage. | ✓Only 3 open issues indicate a stable and mature package. |
| Performance | Suitable for larger applications but heavier on resources. | ✓Highly efficient with a minimalistic approach, ensuring fast performance. |
| Last Updated | Last updated on 2025-01-01; more static development pace. | ✓More recently updated as of 2026-02-03; indicates active development. |
| Weekly Downloads | 471.1K weekly downloads indicate moderate popularity. | ✓21.6M weekly downloads show widespread acceptance and usage. |
| Community Support | Strong community with 19.5K stars, but larger issues present. | ✓Larger community with 56.9K stars, indicating robust user engagement. |
| Overall Positioning | Best for complex state management with fine-grained reactivity. | ✓Ideal for lightweight and simple state management needs. |